Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Smear Pattern (The Wilsons weren't the only victims)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 10:39 PM
Original message
Smear Pattern (The Wilsons weren't the only victims)
Smear Pattern

Dec. 3, 2005

by Paul Sperry

On July 15, 2003, ABC News aired a story about the plummeting morale of U.S. troops in Iraq. It quoted soldiers questioning the war and the judgment and candor of their commanders. One frosted GI even went on camera to call for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to resign.

It was a devastating report, and the White House went into orbit over it. Rather than address the issues the soldiers raised, angry White House officials devised a plan to attack the messenger – the ABC correspondent who filed the story, Jeffrey Kofman.

He's gay, officials whispered to cyber-gossip Matt Drudge, a reliable Bush toady. Not only that, they sneered, he's not even an American. He's a Canadian.

Drudge, no longer the gadfly he once was during the Clinton years, dutifully posted a banner smear of Kofman on his Web site the day after the powerful ABC story, which had made national headlines. Drudge, who supports the Iraq invasion, later acknowledged the White House tipping him off, remarking that it "has become slightly more aggressive about contacting reporters."

(snip)

http://www.antiwar.com/sperry/?articleid=8201

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. gay and canadian!?!?!?!
well, that's just too much -- and i'm gay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. and the info re: leo straus is great.
it's very important to know the history of neocons.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The horror! The horror!
It sort of reminds me of the brouhaha about NJ Gov. McGreevey. His alleged "ex-lover" (Golan Cipel) threatens to sue him, then, after McGreevey has been thoroughly trashed and has resigned in disgrace, the "ex-lover" drops the incipient lawsuit and escapes to Israel.

If that whole thing didn't stink to high heaven, I don't know what does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. you are picking maybe the perfect incident in modern politics
Edited on Sun Dec-04-05 01:16 PM by xchrom
to explain leo straus.
his legacy is very deep -- there is a history professor that is one of his major proteges teaching at harvard now -- i forget his name -- but it's examples like that show the amoeba like spread of strausian thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yes--his legacy, which includes deliberate lying and elitism, is
frighteningly in evidence all over America, especially in Washington, D.C.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. it's frustrating that our dem leadership seems so woefully ignorant
of strausian apostles and how they operate.

i don't get it - i mean i get the dlc -- i don't get the more traditional progressives seeming so weak in the face of it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. As a New Jerseyan, the reason he resigned is that he
was involved in a huge amount of corruption. He tried to put said lover, who had no relevent experience in the position that was head of the State's equivilent to homeland security. Several people associated with him were in trouble for pay to play abuses.

NJ is pretty liberal - being gay wouldn't have been a huge issue - though likely it would have been a huge story. and he did the Department of Motor Vehicles to work much better than anyone in decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Be that as it may, I'm guessing that said lover was probably
a better choice to head a state "homeland security" agency than was Tom Ridge to head the national one. Or Bernard Kerik.

At least, he might have been a better choice, if he had not actually been a "plant"--which is what he now seems to have been.

When a politician takes office, I'm sure there are many, many, rackets who are waiting their turn for him to give them their usual piece of the action. It must be hard to figure out what to do--whether to thumb one's nose at all of them (risking disaster and even assassination), or to play along until you gather the power to oust them while still being personally protected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Kind of makes you wonder how many of our reps are being blackmailed
The lobbyists show them a really, really good time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick
lol -- maaaaaybe somebody else will get interested in this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC