http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/001116.html"It has always been under Donald Rumsfeld that these abuses have occurred. He should have been forced to resign two years ago, but he still stands strong -- giving his "aw shucks, it's not my fault" responses to these disasters.
Over the weekend, Tim Russert pushed Senator John Warner on the subject of battalion commanders' alleged requests for more troops to accomplish their missions in Iraq. Warner would not comment on what was said in a private meeting with these field commanders, but word leaked out that nearly all field commanders have been requesting more troops -- and made a major plea for such troops in August 2005.
Rumsfeld continues to say that he has not been asked by his commanding officers for more troops and would give them whatever they need. This is clearly a political optics game. Rumsfeld is lying and knows that U.S. commanders on the ground do not believe that they have the troop levels to do the job being requested -- and that their commanders in the Pentagon are not asking for more troops because Rumsfeld does not want them to.
Rumsfeld is destroying the U.S. military, its morale, and its nuts-and-bolts operations.
Because of Abu Ghraib, this Aegis Defense video, and many other incidents that have exposed immoral behavior by American operatives engaged in what appears to average Iraqis to be an occupation and not a liberation -- our soldiers cannot do much more than flounder in current circumstances. To really get hold of Iraq again would take, according to Zbigniew Brzezinski, 500,000 troops -- four times what we have currently deployed."
I'm having trouble thinking of a punishment for Rummy that would be satisfying enough. We don't do "drawn and quartered" anymore.