Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ron Paul (R) Texas on upcoming wars in the middle east...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 01:58 PM
Original message
Ron Paul (R) Texas on upcoming wars in the middle east...
a repub with the blinders off! Refreshing and troubling!

HON. RON PAUL OF TEXAS
BEFORE THE US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
October 26, 2005

We Have Been Warned

We have been warned. Prepare for a broader war in the Middle East, as plans are being laid for the next U.S. led regime change-- in Syria. A UN report on the death of Lebanese Prime Minister Rafig Hariri elicited this comment from a senior U.S. policy maker: “Out of tragedy comes an extraordinary strategic opportunity.” This statement reflects the continued neo-conservative, Machiavellian influence on our foreign policy. The “opportunity” refers to the long-held neo-conservative plan for regime change in Syria, similar to what was carried out in Iraq.

This plan for remaking the Middle East has been around for a long time. Just as 9/11 served the interests of those who longed for changes in Iraq, the sensationalism surrounding Hariri’s death is being used to advance plans to remove Assad.

Congress already has assisted these plans by authorizing the sanctions placed on Syria last year. Harmful sanctions, as applied to Iraq in the 1990s, inevitably represent a major step toward war since they bring havoc to so many innocent people. Syria already has been charged with developing weapons of mass destruction based on no more evidence than was available when Iraq was similarly charged.

Syria has been condemned for not securing its borders, by the same U.S. leaders who cannot secure our own borders. Syria was castigated for placing its troops in Lebanon, a neighboring country, although such action was invited by an elected government and encouraged by the United States. The Syrian occupation of Lebanon elicited no suicide terrorist attacks, as was suffered by Western occupiers.

Condemning Syria for having troops in Lebanon seems strange, considering most of the world sees our 150,000 troops in Iraq as an unwarranted foreign occupation. Syrian troops were far more welcome in Lebanon.

Secretary Rice likewise sees the problems in Syria-- that we helped to create-- as an opportunity to advance our Middle Eastern agenda. In recent testimony she stated that it was always the administration’s intent to redesign the greater Middle East, and Iraq was only one part of that plan. And once again we have been told that all options are still on the table for dealing with Syria-- including war.

The statement that should scare all Americans (and the world) is the assurance by Secretary Rice that the President needs no additional authority from Congress to attack Syria. She argues that authority already has been granted by the resolutions on 9/11 and Iraq. This is not true, but if Congress remains passive to the powers assumed by the executive branch it won’t matter. As the war spreads, the only role for Congress will be to provide funding lest they be criticized for not supporting the troops. In the meantime, the Constitution and our liberties here at home will be further eroded as more Americans die.

This escalation of conflict with Syria comes as a result of the UN report concerning the Hariri death. When we need an excuse for our actions, it’s always nice to rely on the organization that our administration routinely condemns, one that brought us the multi-billion dollar oil-for-food scandal and sexual crimes by UN representatives.

http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2005/cr102605.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. MR Danger invades Syria and Israel bombs away at Iran.
Welcome to WWIII.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. very important story---recommended
Edited on Sun Oct-30-05 02:06 PM by Douglas Carpenter

I hate to say this but this is not only GOP Neocons. There are some on the fringe-right of the Democratic Party who would push for such things under the racist epithet of fighting "Islamo-fascism".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Name your Neocons. So which one said,
"Out of tragedy comes an extraordinary strategic opportunity."

Did it sound like someone was talking while sucking on their haircomb?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. the President needs no additional authority from Congress to attack Syria"
that's a headline that should have been.
MSM, where the hell are you on this? Wake the hell up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. The U.S. and the Moslem world are not going to save themselves.
Both are determined to win.

Who in this world is going to step forward and save Syria and Iran? (As well as Venezuela, Cuba, and Bolivia?)

Who in this world is going to be the world's early 21st Century peacemaker?

Does the entire world want a WW III?

Why is the world letting this happen when there is still time to negotiate?

The agenda is so transparent. Why is everyone sitting on their duff and why is the debt heavy U.S. going to waste another trillion or so?

For Israel? For profit? For hate?

The people of the world want peace.

The CHILDREN of the world want peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qanisqineq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Where are the troops gonna come from?
I have a neighbor that hadn't been with her husband (besides a 2-week leave he had) in over 2 years. And she has a daughter that is 2 1/2 years old and doesn't know her father. My neighbors have all recently returned from Iraq except for the female soldier that got pregnant to avoid Iraq. They aren't thrilled (to put it mildly) by the war, do you think they are really going to want to be sent off to yet another one?

The soldiers I know... I don't know if they would tolerate it. They want to be with their spouses and children. My husband would probably up and disappear if Emperor George started a new war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. So stupid, because Syria might oust Assad semi-peacefully anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. So is the Syrian invasion coming before of after that Iranian invasion
that was supposed to happen back in June?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Great, Ron, but you'll still suck right-wing dick and enable their evil
Libertarians make me puke. They're selfish adolescents with a pompous simplicity that defies all reason.

Great. So he's against foreign entanglements. Big deal. If he really gave a fuck about the human race he'd go independent and caucus with the Democrats. He'll never do this, though, because as a Libertarian he's a greedy idiot who hates taxes, regulations and any obligation to his fellow man.

It's nice to hear him speak out like this, as he has for quite some time, but it's hollow rhetoric if he's still going to assist these dicks in every other arena.

Yes, we're going to fuck Syria. We tried to do it in April '03 but just didn't have the wherewithal to do so. This is the PNAC at work, and all enemies of Israel are more important targets than any others, including ones with oil. (Syria has precious little oil, by the way...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. You are 100% correct
About libertarians and about the PNAC.... I posted this article just because it was nice to hear a grain of truth from another side for once
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. That's my quandry...he's like Lou Dobbs & outsourcing...

Hey fellas, read your own damn words and act on them



:shrug: some people!:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. If he went independent, he wouldn't get reelected.
At least by getting elected, he still has a voice against the party he claims to be a part of. Plus, he still votes with the administration line about 75% of the time, so why would he caucus with Dems?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC