Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitzgerald will strike a balance between Democrats hope and Repug fears...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
hiabrill Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:21 PM
Original message
Fitzgerald will strike a balance between Democrats hope and Repug fears...
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 04:22 PM by hiabrill
That's as much as I can figure from all the leaks of info....

That's the only way he'd get support and cooperation to continue the investigation from all sides, which I believe he need to do before serving a major indictment to Cheney and Bush.....


None of the initial Indictments will touch on the "false justification for war", a disappointment for Dems, but a relief for the repugs, but Rove and Libby are history + a few others.


Fitzgerald is going to meticulously bring down the whole Bush Administration. I'm expecting an Epic bigger in proportions in comparison to Clinton-gate.


They wanted a New World order and they got it...!!!! We're taking back America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GumboYaYa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. I disagree, I think Fitzgerald will make the best professional judgment
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 04:24 PM by GumboYaYa
he can based on the facts and the law regardless of the political implications either way. Everything I have read about him says he is that type of prosecutor. I know a few guys like this. They don't give a damn about politics. They feel a calling to uphold and enforce the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectroPrincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Bush and his SS troops will fire him ...
Me thinks we are truly in a "world of shit." :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Bush cannot fire him.
According to the GAO he has plenary power, which means he has plenty of power :-). Bush cannot fire him. Gonzalez cannot fire him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dmitri Willguard Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Me agrees. Me agrees. (N/T)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. You are correct
Fitzgerald, by all accounts, is totally apolitical. He couldn''t care less about striking a balance between anyone. Democrats and Republicans mean nothing to a guy like this. He is going to follow the law, dot every i and cross every t, and let the chips fall where they may. What he reveals to us will be the law and the way someone violated it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiabrill Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. My biggest worry....
....has been the talk that Fitz will seek charges for easier-to-prove crimes such as making false statements, obstruction of justice and disclosing classified information.


I'm worried he's steered away from big indictments, but I'm hopeful he will return to them after a second Grand Jury.


I want to see indictments which state a conspiracy to deliberately deceive Congress into authorizing the war. To get to such a indictment he probably needs a second Grand Jury.


Cheney-Bush committed high-crimes by hijacking US foreign policy and misleading Congress. They must pay for their crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiabrill Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I sure as hell hope you're right....
I read about him as well and felt the same, but ignoring the politics in this case is impossible, IMO. So much is at stake.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. What support of cooperation does he need?
He has the power of the Attorney General without having to report to the Administration...

He effectively is a 4th branch of the gov't right now.

He can not be fired. He can not be obstructed (unless those who obstruct him want to go to prison).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiabrill Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. support and cooperation from witnesses
and informant from within the Bush Admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. From everything I've read about him, I think his decisions...
...in the case will be 100% apolitical. This scares Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. I have to agree with GumboYaYa
Fitz's sole consideration is the law, and how best to enforce it.

If he has them by the short hairs, he's not going to hold back anything. He may hold some indictments to get the bigger fish, but not because of any political expediant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shockingelk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. I am thinking two rounds of indictments
One for perjury/obstruction of justice, and a second round once the first round shakes out all the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiabrill Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. That's exactly how I see it as well
Anything less than "perjury" & "obstruction of justice" would be a major disappointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 15th 2024, 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC