Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

the Bushes now have THREE STOOGES on the SC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:13 AM
Original message
the Bushes now have THREE STOOGES on the SC
Thomas, Roberts, and Miers.

Three stooges sit there for the Bushes. Full, flat-out pawns.

Can they get five before W's out of the WH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Under counted--Scalia?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frankly_fedup2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. What about Scalia? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Fourth stooge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I Have A Dream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. A couple of people mentioned "Scalia". This is questionable...
at this point because my guess is that he's really, really p*ssed at B* because he was not made the Chief Justice. Who knows what he'll do since he has such a big ego.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. Miers isn't on the court "now."
FYI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Can we retake the Senate in 2006? THAT is the question.
Bellyaching about what kind of appointments Bush has made or will make is pretty fruitless. He's not going to get any smarter, wiser, or more concerned with Americans' freedoms in the next three years. The only thing that can check Bush's nominees is for us to retake the Senate in 2006.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC