|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
donsu
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 11:22 AM Original message |
Rather was prevented from going after smirk's N.G. paper's rigging |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
1. kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
2. I think at this point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oeditpus Rex
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 10:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
29. Y'know, I've gotten way past sick of hearing this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:54 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. An article from Common Dreams |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 09:15 AM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Did you just point me to an article by Brent Bozo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oeditpus Rex
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:37 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. Are you addressing me or mirandapriestly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:56 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. I am addressing you, who included in your post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oeditpus Rex
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:42 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. I linked to a site with results of the Project for Excellence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gordianot
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
3. Remember who got weapons grade Anthrax in the mail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MnFats
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
4. Jesus. Have these people EVER behaved decently? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
young_at_heart
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
5. Can't SOMEONE look into this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 01:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. So basically... either a major felony was committed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grannylib
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
6. This has troubled me for a long time...we KNOW that * has no military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
7. It is not a matter of the media being scared..it is that they are part of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunny planet
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 11:55 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Perhaps Rather meant that the few decent reporters and anchors left |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginnyinWI
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 12:22 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. this seems to be so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 01:44 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. I hope you are right about the crumbling of the Repubs, however |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginnyinWI
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 03:45 PM Response to Reply #14 |
25. I don't think GE is in Iraq anymore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 03:22 PM Response to Reply #7 |
23. They have devolved into a corporate arm of the government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rzemanfl
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
9. Seems to me that if someone had access to an IBM selectric |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemReadingDU
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 12:19 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Here are a couple of old dKos threads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rzemanfl
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 12:29 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Thanks. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lefty48197
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
15. "Your profession is honorable, and it's needed now more than ever" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nvliberal
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
16. Madsen = no credibility. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Witch
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
17. sophisticated text scanner? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
18. Fall 2004, * promised Federal Media Ownership Rules Changes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cassiepriam
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
19. What specifically is the fear? Job loss? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 03:20 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Anthrax. Again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cassiepriam
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 05:20 AM Response to Reply #22 |
32. This does not surprise me. They will destroy anything in their path. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
20. Help! I'm confused |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
21. Dan Rather is not quitting. And he won't be forgetting Karl |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
24. It was Mary Mapes fault entirely that CBS got burned w/ the set-up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 10:05 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Get real. She was a terget too. Who expects felony forgery of document? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 08:43 AM Response to Reply #27 |
33. Incorrect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbieinok
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 05:36 PM Response to Reply #24 |
44. Paul Lukasiak(sp?) researcher on the AWOL salon.tabletalk thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 07:17 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Thanks, I'll check it out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbieinok
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 07:24 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. he posted a lot about the time W's non-service was hitting the news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakemewhenitsover
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
26. Was a second motive to pressure CBS to cancel Niger story? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor
![]() |
Sun Oct-02-05 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
28. Link about how WH had Viacom by the balls over media ownership laws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladylibertee
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 04:10 AM Response to Original message |
31. Not surprised.The Republicans have been doing that since |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lateo
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
35. Anyone esle besides Wayne Madsen reporting this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 04:12 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. It's classic Madsen.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chat_noir
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
36. Truth and Duty : The Press, the President, and the Privilege of Power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 04:16 PM Response to Reply #36 |
43. Yikes..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
40. Why aren't any high level Democrats looking into this? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
41. Sophisticated scanner for changing text? Oh Madsen does it again! (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jul 13th 2025, 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC