Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Nation: 15 Pro-CAFTA Dems "faced little or no pressure from the W.H."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 05:21 AM
Original message
The Nation: 15 Pro-CAFTA Dems "faced little or no pressure from the W.H."
BLOG | Posted 07/28/2005 @ 1:44pm
CAFTA Vote Outs "Bush Democrats"
John Nichols

http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?bid=1&pid=8874

The Republicans who split with the president withstood immense pressure from the White House and corporate lobbyists in order to take a stand with the organized labor, environmental, farm and international human rights groups that opposed the agreement. They were so courageous and so consistent in their determination to block the president's agenda that, during the floor debate, Representative Sherrod Brown, the Ohio Democrat who led opposition to CAFTA, specifically praised Republicans such as Idaho's Butch Otter and North Carolina's Walter Jones for their efforts.

On the other hand, the Democrats who supported Bush's agenda faced little or no pressure from the White House. Nor did they show anything akin to courage or consistency. They simply voted with the White House because, either they agree with the president's misguided approach to global trade or they thought they could trade their votes for big contributions from the corporate interests that see the NAFTA/CAFTA model of free trade as an opportunity to improve business bottom lines at the expense of workers, the environment and communities in the U.S. and Latin America.

Let's give the Bush Democrats the benefit of the doubt and accept that they actually support the corporate model for trade that Bush backs. This puts them at odds with mainstream Democrats on what can only be described as the most fundamental of economic issues -- as trade deals get into the core questions of whether American workers will have jobs, whether communities can maintain their industrial bases, whether government has the power to protect the environment, and whether the U.S. government will be a willing co-conspirator in the exploitation of men, women and children in developing countries.

So, unless they are crooks who trade their votes for campaign checks, the Bush Democrats are supporters of a corporate agenda that Representative Robert Menendez -- a New Jersey Democrat who has a long history of involvement with Latin American affairs -- explained during the CAFTA debate would harm U.S. workers and farmers while plunging Central American countries deeper into poverty and causing more Latin Americans to migrate to the U.S. At the least, this suggests that the Bush Democrats -- Melissa Bean of Illinois, Jim Cooper of Tennessee, Henry Cuellar of Texas, Norm Dicks of Washington, Ruben Hinojosa of Texas, William Jefferson of Louisiana, Jim Matheson of Utah, Gregory Meeks of New York, Dennis Moore of Kansas, Jim Moran of Virginia, Solomon Ortiz of Texas, Ike Skelton of Missouri, Vic Snyder of Arkansas, John Tanner of Tennessee, and Edolphus Towns of New York -- are on the wrong side of history, and of humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Recommended! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. The following was posted on "The Nation" in response to the article:
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?bid=1&pid=8874

A bit more.

More good reading (counterpunch.org) on the Democrat failure and CAFTA:

Blame the Democrats Passing CAFTA

By JOSHUA FRANK

The final vote on CAFTA, the free trade agreement between the US and Central America, rolled out in the wee hours of July 28. It was a tight vote in the House, a squeaking 217-215, where 15 Democrats crossed over to support the measure while 27 Republicans voted against it. Supporters CAFTA anticipate abolishing custom taxes and undermining labor and environmental laws over time among the countries involved, which will consist of the US, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Guatemala, Honduras, and Dominican Republic. CAFTA will eliminate tariffs on 80 percent of US exports to these countries.

CAFTA was first approved in the Senate a few weeks ago when 10 neoliberal Democrats crossed over to support Bush's obtuse trade legislation, which slipped by with a 55-45 vote. Twelve Senate Republicans opposed the bill. It was California's liberal Dianne Feinstein and Oregon's Ron Wyden who led the way in Democratic support for the legislation. Had the Democrats opposed the agreement in the Senate, CAFTA would have been defeated. But the Dems support for CAFTA in the Senate and now the House of Representatives has handed Bush a major victory ...

If you are one of the people who has been burned by corporate Democrats on "free" trade, now is the time to send the message! Tell your friends, your neighbors, your co-workers: take 'em down! No votes for radical corporatist Democrats, no money, no attention paid!

Posted by ZERO 07/28/2005 @ 1:56pm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. These "Democratic" traitors to their party........
and the people of this country better hope that they secured themselves good jobs in the corporate whore sector, because they will no longer have the support of grass roots Democrats. Without that, they're dog-food.
We're fed up with these bush enabling DINOs, and their days representing (or not) us are numbered. SEEYA, TRAITORS! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. obviously..
.. they're not really Dems but rather part of the one party system, the business party.

ananda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. These fifteen need to be made an example of RIGHT NOW.
Edited on Sun Jul-31-05 07:57 AM by Totally Committed
What Pelosi should do:

**** They should have all important committee assignments taken from them for the duration of their tenure in the House.

**** No more "pork" for their districts added on to any bill for the duration of their tenure. NONE. Let the corporations that promised them the moon for thier treachery bail them out.

What Howard Dean and the DNC should do:

**** ALL grassroots support and monies should be pulled from their districts. All new infrastructure supporting them should be stopped for the duration of their tenure

What their Constituents should do:

**** Write them and let them know that all the corporate money in the world will not save their jobs. They should be updating their resumees, because they are fired. And, next election, fire them.

All of these things should happen NOW. Not tomorrow. Not next week. NOW. They need to feel the pain. If they get off with a slap on the wrist or no consequences at all, Pelosi and Reid will never be able to guarantee a vote on either of their floors again. These a-holes need to go down, and they need to go down big.

Reid should be doing the same in the Senate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The Dianne Feinstein debate needs to come to an end, once and for all.
True, she doesn't have a hell of a lot of supporters on DU.

We need to get to the point where she doesn't have ANY.

"It was California's liberal Dianne Feinstein and Oregon's Ron Wyden who led the way in Democratic support for the legislation."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Amen, DiFi needs to go...
Her pro-Corporate/quasi Republican stances suck, and her position on GLBT issues is Stone Age. Her position on this is shameful.

Gavin Newsome is a new face to consider. ANd, there are more out there. California's a big state. They need to ditch this bitch NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. She's also a cosponsor of the Patriot Act renewal.
Her husband is making BILLIONS off of no-bid contracts in Iraq, and an additional fortune on weapons.

DiFi is scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. And what is their thinking on that? Why
is cafta good for America according to wyden and feinstein?

Didn't wyden vote against the IWR?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Her Web Site shows the "yes" vote, but that's it.
She's got press releases and such, but none that I could find on CAFTA. Maybe she was thinking that she could give it a yes vote and no one would notice.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Wyden - Nike
I imagine. It's his only bad vote of the year, and they all have them sooner or later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. yeah, should....
but won't..

So fifty years from now the world can say
"shoulda, coulda, woulda"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunnystarr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Well yes and no
"**** ALL grassroots support and monies should be pulled from their districts. All new infrastructure supporting them should be stopped for the duration of their tenure

Just pull support and money from these candidates in the primary and give the money to a viable Dem challenger. We can't afford to limit the local democratic party in any district.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. That's actually more what I meant, but just worded it badly.
Thank you for your clarification!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
10. sad really...
ignorant-opportunists in the least...corp-vote-selling-whores at worst...you decide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. kick.....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
podnoi Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. Anyone checked their site recently?
Edited on Sun Jul-31-05 09:24 PM by podnoi
Have they always been so agressive? Just reading their "Leadership" page... Does this look like a movement that wants to bring the party together?

They call themselves the "New Democrats" (what is new about the same old corporate cowtowing?). I have not kept up with their Marketing, only how they vote (against the people it seems to me). If they were trying to Replace the Democratic party I was not aware of it. But that is what it sounds like?

http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ka.cfm?kaid=86

"The Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) leads the New Democrat movement, a national network of elected officials and community leaders whose innovative ideas are modernizing progressive politics for the 21st Century. "

How can they claim *both* to be the "Original" Democratic Party *and* "New Democrats" at the same time? Doesn't this sound like Orwellian (re: Repub marketing strategies) doublespeak?

Edited to fix link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. Illegal Republican tactics on CAFTA
I guess he didn't interview Nancy Pelosi. Too bad people don't get that EVERYBODY has an agenda.

"The House of Representatives' top Democrat accused Republicans on Thursday of possibly illegal action to encourage some Democrats to vote for a free-trade pact with Central America...

At a briefing hours later, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, complained that deals offered by House Republicans to win CAFTA made the House seem like the "set of 'Let's Make a Deal,"' referring to a TV game show.

Some Democrats were made offers that they said they didn't think "passed legal muster," Pelosi told reporters."

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20050728/pl_nm/trade_cafta_politics_dc_2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC