I thought it might be a good idea to review old Plame articles....

[FormerRepublican]

...to keep our memory fresh about what exactly is going on so we can counter those lies BushCo is spinning.

First, my favorite quote:

"Each instance of disclosure of Plame's identity would be a separate crime."

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,724804,00.html

The President Bush is in TROUBLE now article:

http://www.yuricareport.com/Law%20&%20Legal/DeanBushHiresLawyer.html

Some info on the Grand Jury:

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0124-06.htm

A list of some of the low level guys who have testified:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/05/24/national/main619253.shtml

Some very interesting data I had previously overlooked:

"But prosecutors have said they would charge White House aides with obstruction of justice or false statements if they failed to provide truthful statements about specific conversations that some aides could not clearly recall among the hundreds of conversations with some White House reporters, the lawyers said.

Prosecutors have emphasized the seriousness of the case, informing the White House employees that they are "subjects" of the inquiry. In legal terminology, a subject is in potentially greater jeopardy of being accused of a crime than a witness. But a subject is in a less threatening situation than a target, someone who may expect to be charged."

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/10/politics/10LEAK.html?position=&ei=5007&en=a354e49697830b16&ex=1391749200&adxnnl=1&partner=USERLAND&pagewanted=all&adxnnlx=1121136265-aBG7VNk9HROsoh1bmhMTWg

And an overview of Grand Juries:

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/10/politics/10LEAK.html?ei=5007&en=a354e49697830b16&ex=1391749200&partner=USERLAND&pagewanted=all&position=

[mom cat]

1. nice compilation..Thanks

[Eloriel]

2. Most excellent ... Nominating

And welcome to DU! I hope you'll be very happy here, and I certainly look forward to more terrific contributions such as this one.