Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How did the White House react to Novak's article?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 08:24 PM
Original message
How did the White House react to Novak's article?
Did they refute what he said about "two senior administration officials" giving him the info re. Valerie Plame?

Did they call him a liar or whatever?

If not, then it would seem that the White House and Novak have some sort of arrangement or agreement in place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Novak and the White House in cahoots???
Next you'll be telling me that Rush Limbaugh and Matt Drudge both get the same talking points.

I think they just ignored it and waited for it to go away.

They're still doing that, actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. What's bothering me is that Novak is apparently getting off scot-free
HE is the guy who publicly revealed Plame's identity. He is the guy who said that it was "two senior administration officials" who gave him that information.

What bothers me most of all is that because there is apparently no legal pressure being put on him, we might not ever know the true culprits. If a prosecutor were to, say, threaten him with 10 years in prison, Novak would be singing every song in the book. But that doesn't seem to be the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoFederales Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Very plausible,
but the WH, to my recollection, was always mum on the story regarding Novak. So it's like you are suggesting, or maybe it is just standard operating procedure to never say anything about "friendly" sources. This waiting has really got me knotted up; I want that small hole in the dike (no reference to any of Bush gang) to open up and spill the ocean of lies and filth everywhere.

NoFederales

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC