Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harry S. Truman 1948 Campaign Speech (Give Them Hell!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 09:13 AM
Original message
Harry S. Truman 1948 Campaign Speech (Give Them Hell!)
Edited on Sun May-22-05 09:43 AM by Trajan
Truman nails it : He gores the GOP for their economic malfeasance and sycophancy to the rich .... Most of this speech could be given today, and be spot-on accurate .... EVERYTHING Truman said about what could happen under a GOP government is what we are seeing today; it is what was seen during the Harding, Coolidge and Hoover regimes, the last time a GOP government had a chance to ruin the nation ....

The GOP has never changed ....

This is long, but reading it shows you how powerful and honest Democrats can be if they focus on what matters to citizens ....



Address in Charleston, West Virginia
October 1, 1948

By President Harry S Truman:


Mr. Chairman, Governor of West Virginia, distinguished guests:

For the past 2 weeks I have been visiting the people of this country. I have met
thousands of people and spoken to hundreds of thousands. I think I have been
seen by at least 2½ million people in this country.

I have a vital message to bring to the people of the United States, and tonight
I want to bring that message to you.

The heart of my message is this: The national election this fall will decide
matters of grave importance to every man, woman, and child in the United States.
It will affect the security of your jobs, your homes, and your future.

You have a choice between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party.

Within the memory of most of us here, a clear record has been written that shows
how much difference that choice can make.

The Republicans wrote part of their record from 1921 to 1933. They led the
country to depression, poverty, and despair.

It is easy to forget what the black days of the depression were like. Let us
recall a few, just a few of the bitter facts.

In 1932, after 12 years of Republican bungling, more than 12 million men and
women were unemployed.

In 1932 the average worker in manufacturing industries was making 45 cents an
hour -- if he was lucky enough to have a job. In coal mining, the most hazardous
of all occupations, miners were making 52 cents an hour -- if they were lucky
enough to have jobs.

The working men and women in this country could not do much to help themselves,
because the strength of their unions had been broken by the reactionary labor
policies of the Republican administration.

The Republican bubble burst in 1929, and when it burst:

-- There was no minimum wage to cushion the blow.

-- There was no unemployment compensation to carry the working man's family
along.

-- There was no work relief program to help people through the crisis.

-- But the party of privilege was ready to carry big business through the
crisis. It created the Reconstruction Finance Corporation for that purpose. The
banks, the railways, the insurance companies -- they got relief, but not the
American people.

-- For the unemployed, it was Hoovervilles and soup kitchens. Veterans were
encouraged to go into business for themselves -- selling apples.

That is the Republican record. Most of us well remember it. The Democratic part
of the record begins in 1933, when the Democratic Party began to build
prosperity for business, labor, and agriculture.



We wrote into law the right of the working men and women to organize in unions
of their own choice, and to bargain collectively.

We put a floor under wages.

We outlawed child labor.

We created a great insurance system to protect working men and women against the
hazards of unemployment and old age.

We wrote into law a system of price supports for farm products, so that the
bottom would not drop from under the farmer's income the way it did in the
1920's.

We put a curb on Wall Street speculation, and stopped the money changers from
gambling with people's savings.



With these reforms and many others, the Democratic Party brought the country to
the greatest period of prosperity ever known in the history of the world.

Things are far different now from what they were in 1932.

The average farm income of the farmer in 1947 was $725 per person, nearly ten
times as great. In 1932 it was $74 per person.

The coal miner who got 52 cents an hour in 1932, gets $1.94 an hour in 1948. He
deserves every cent of it, too; and I'm glad to see him get it.

And business hasn't suffered too much under the New Deal! Corporations had a
loss of $4 billion in 1932. But in 1947 they had a profit of $17 billion, after
taxes.

These same corporations -- these same corporations now claim the Democrats are
hostile to business. If I were in their shoes, I would want some more of that
kind of hostility.

Today, signs of prosperity are all over the country. I have been all over the
country, and I know what I am talking about!

Farm production is greater than it ever was. Industrial production is greater
than it every was. Everybody who wants a job can get one.

That's the way America is today. The real question facing us in this election is
whether or not we are going to keep it that way.

For all this did not come about by accident. Some people would like to make you
think it did. The leaders of the Republican Party would like you to believe that
the country just drifted into the great depression, and that it just drifted out
again into prosperity. They would like you to believe that the Democratic New
Deal had nothing to do with recovery -- and that the Republicans had nothing to
do with the Hoover panic.



That is not true and the people know it is not true.

The country was driven into depression by the policies of a Republican
administration and a Republican Congress that served the selfish interests of
the rich and powerful business groups.

The country was brought out of the depression by the intelligent foresight and
planning of the Democratic Party -- and above all by following the fundamental
belief of the Democratic Party that the true road to prosperity begins with
looking after the little fellow. The Republicans believe in taking care of big
business first and letting the little fellow take care of himself.

The Republicans would like you to forget these fundamental differences between
the two parties. But during the past 2 years we have been given a sharp warning
that these differences still exist, and these differences are wide and deep.
That has been made completely clear by the record of this Republican
"do-nothing" 80th Congress.

No matter what the Republicans do or say, the Republicans cannot escape
responsibility for that black record.

I know, of course, that there are many fine people throughout the United States,
who from habit or choice are members of the Republican Party. To them I say that
the national leadership of their party has failed them miserably.

I know, too, that among the Republicans of the 80th Congress there were a few
liberal men who joined the battle against special privilege. You can pick these
men out by their votes. They voted with the Democrats in the Congress more often
than they did with their own Republican leadership. When these men went to their
party caucuses they must have felt very lonesome.

The record of the 80th Congress was made by the forces that dominate the
Republican Party.

I thank God that the men who held positions of leadership in dealing with
foreign affairs were of a character which made it possible for us to work
together in carrying out our foreign policy on a bipartisan basis.

But on domestic issues it was a different matter. The Republican leadership
started out to follow the same policies that nearly wrecked the country under
Harding, Coolidge, and Hoover.

Some people have accused me of failing to cooperate with the Republican
leadership in carrying out those policies. Now, I must confess to you that I am
going to plead guilty to that charge. Of course, I did not cooperate in carrying
out policies that I knew would bring disaster on the American people.

But I will tell you how you can get some cooperation in carrying out those
policies -- if that's what you want. I will tell l you how you can achieve unity
in a headlong dash toward another depression. Just elect a Republican President
to go along with a Republican Congress.

Just elect a man who said -- and I quote: "I am proud of the record of my party
and of the 80th Congress."

Just elect a man who said: "The 80th Congress delivered as no other Congress
ever did for the future of our country."

Apparently he will be glad to help deliver a lot more of the same kind of blows
you got from the 80th Congress. But bigger blows -- and faster and more of them.

What did this Republican Congress deliver for the future of the country?

For one thing, it delivered a body blow at labor in the form of the Taft-Hartley
Act.



The fundamental purpose of the Taft-Hartley Act is to weaken organized labor.
Its supporters want management to have the upper hand in collective bargaining.
Do you know why? They want management to have the upper hand so that wages can
be driven down.

What else did the Republican Congress deliver for the future of our country?

It delivered a body blow at nearly a million workers by taking away their social
security rights.

It delivered a body blow at millions of our veterans by refusing to provide a
decent housing program.

It delivered a blow at every family in the Nation by failing to act on high
prices.

What else did the Republican Congress deliver for the future of our country? It
delivered a whole long list of blows at every foundation of our present
prosperity and at our hopes for progress in the future. I can't cover them all
tonight, but I will tell you about just one more.

That is the rich man's tax relief bill.

The Republican Congress passed a tax bill that reduced the revenues of the
Government by more than $5 billion. That Congress passed it three times and I
vetoed it every time. But on the third try, they passed it over my veto.

I believed that the safety of our national finances required that we make large
payments on the public debt in times of prosperity. I still think so.

But the Republican rich man's tax relief bill has brought us face to face with
the prospect of going into the red again.

I believed that when the wartime taxes were reduced, the poor man should be
relieved first and most. I still think so. But the Republican tax bill doesn't
work that way.

I warned that the tax reduction bill would add to the inflationary pressures and
make prices go even higher. And it did.

For most of you, the tax bill hasn't helped a bit. If you make $60 a week, your
taxes were reduced about $1.50 a week. But since May, when that $1.50 began to
show up in your pay envelope, prices have gone up so much that the $1.50 is
already wiped out.

The rich man fared much better under the tax bill. A married couple with an
income of $100,000 a year got a tax cut of $16,725 a year -- $16,725 a year!
That's about $12,000 more than my net salary as President of the United States.

Of course, prices haven't gone up for them any more than they have for you. So I
would say that they came out pretty well.

Is it any wonder that we call this a rich man's tax relief bill?

That's typical of the way the Republican 80th Congress delivered for the future
of the country. Some time later, I am going to elaborate on just exactly what
they did with the budget this year. And it fits in with this rich man's tax
relief bill. It's outrageous what they did to the country on that.

That Congress delivered for the interests that had their lobbyists swarming all
over the Capital. It delivered for special privilege groups that put up the big
money at election time.

They are doing that right now in this election. That same bunch of lobbyists and
people whom they represent are paying for the Republican campaign right this
minute.

Now, they passed a great many bills, which I vetoed. There is only one President
who has a greater veto record than I have, in the short time that I have been
President, and that is Grover Cleveland; and I am proud of that veto record,
because I was standing there working for the people, when I was signing those
vetoes.

But they passed a great many -- not a great many, but several -- among them this
tax relief bill and the Taft-Hartley bill. They passed those bills over my veto.

But when a bill becomes the law of the land, the President of the United States
has sworn to enforce the law, and as President of the United States, I have
lived up to that oath which I took to support the Constitution and the laws of
the United States.

But if you want these bad things remedied, you had better give me a Congress for
the next 4 years that is working for the people and not for the special
interests.

Now, if you want unity and harmony and sweetness and light in getting more
deliveries of the kind I have been describing, just shut your eyes and vote
Republican.

But if you want something delivered for labor, if you want something delivered
for the farmers, and if you want something delivered for the small businessmen,
and for the white-collar worker -- there is just one way you can make your vote
count. Vote the Democratic ticket.

Today, the Democratic Party is the party of the American people. It was the
party of the people under Jefferson and Jackson. It was the party of the people
under Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt.

Today, we of the Democratic Party express the will of the American people to
move forward, under liberty, yielding neither to communism nor to reaction.

Today, the Democratic Party stands before the country a living force for peace
and freedom.

Today, we are rallying our forces for the greatest struggle in our history. In
that struggle, I ask your support.

Just give us the votes on election day, and we will do the job.



----------------------------------------------

WHERE are the firebrand populists of today's Democratic Party ? ...

Truman spoke TRUTH to power, and wiped them on the floor like an old mop .....

WHERE is the voice of the people today ? ...

Senator Liebermann ? ... Evan Bayh ? ... Even Dennis Kucinich: where is the powerful condemnation of those who treat their own fellow citizens like chattel ? ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
stpalm Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Are you serious?
First of all, Abraham Lincoln was a wonderful president. He saved the country. Secondly, the South voted solidly democratic up until the 30s-40s. So your point doesn't make sense. Lincoln wanted to save the nation so that the South would stay with us and vote Republican? The North voted Republican at that time.

read some history, buddy, before you make sweeping generalizations that don't make any sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnywolf Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. so?
I know that solid south was democratic, still if a lincoln did not preserve the union, we would not have problems we have today!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. There is nothing wrong with expecting ...
some precision in someone's remarks ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. just a gentle reminder
if you don't feed the freepers, they won't proliferate so much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. There are many good Southern Liberals
Perhaps you misspoke ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnywolf Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Not all south is bad
I am not saying that there aren't any good southern democrats! There are. Example are Gore, Clinton..ect. Still my opinion that south is mostly got no clue! South needs North more than North needs South. They use northern tax money! Anyway he we are again a divided nation!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. "dumbies"?
ROFLMAO! The irony of this just tickles me somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Chuckles ....
Hey ! .. Maybe thats how it is REALLY spelt ! ...

(spelt ??? .... Hmmmmmmm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. I'd say that Abe was, at the very least, the lesser evil running in 1860
And there have been some decent Republicans. Teddy Roosevelt, to name one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. I agree that the GOP are corrupt liars
but I disagree about letting the union go--thank goodness it was saved. Most slaves were in the south and had we let the union go how much longer would they have been inslaved? sure, they could have tried to run away and a few might have even made it, but those who didn't would have been treated very harshly. Finally, there are millions of good people in the south--many vote Democratic. There are a great percentage of African Americans still in the south as well and they are the core of our party. We simply need our Democratic leadership to not ignore the south but explain why those who vote Republican are not looking out for the best interests of southerners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. look at the facts F.D.R ,like Lee, did more with less.Shrub is an agent
Edited on Sun May-22-05 09:30 AM by orpupilofnature57
For robbers, nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Shrub IS the robber ...,.
Texas Oil Millionaire ? ....

Sheeeesh ... Never struck oil, but he is a texas oil millionaire ....

How does THAT work ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. This is great, sent it to fellow democrats who just might.....
...remember that speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Hell; we should shout it from the rooftops NOW ....
It applies NOW as well as then ...

Those who HAVENT heard or read it are those who should recognize its truths: The GOP serves ONLY the very rich, at the expense of all else, including our honor and self respect as a nation ....

Nearly EVERY point he makes about them is coming true this moment ....

We werent wrong then : We arent wrong now ...

THEY were wrong then : THEY are wrong now ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. Let's kick this up once or twice ...
So good people can be exposed to what a REAL Democrat says about our opponents in government ....

Poor Harry must be spinning in his grave when we consider how weak-assed our current crop of 'Democrats' fare in the war of ideas ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Done....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. Give 'e hell, Harry!
I think Nader's the only candidate who called for the repeal of Taft-Hartley, though I think Kucinich had it on his web page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
missouri dem 2 Donating Member (308 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
20. And a bit more from Harry:
Harry S. Truman, New York Times (17th November, 1953)

It is now evident that the present Administration has fully embraced, for political advantage, McCarthyism. I am not referring to the Senator from Wisconsin. He is only important in that his name has taken on the dictionary meaning of the word. It is the corruption of truth, the abandonment of the due process law. It is the use of the big lie and the unfounded accusation against any citizen in the name of Americanism or security. It is the rise to power of the demagogue who lives on untruth; it is the spreading of fear and the destruction of faith in every level of society.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
missouri dem 2 Donating Member (308 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. And a few more:
Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.
Harry S Truman, August 8, 1950


I never did give them hell. I just told the truth, and they thought it was hell.
Harry S Truman, in Look, Apr. 3, 1956


Nixon is one of the few in the history of this country to run for high office talking out of both sides of his mouth at the same time and lying out of both sides.
Harry S. Truman


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC