Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Heather Mac Donald OnWashington Journal This Morning...What A Whore!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 09:00 AM
Original message
Heather Mac Donald OnWashington Journal This Morning...What A Whore!
I guess she is a senior fellow with the Manhattan Institute For Policy Research. She was all for the "Patriot" Act, kept spewing out a bunch of bullshit about how the critics are misinformed, make up lies, etc,, etc. She made a regular habit of smearing the ACLU as well. Lots of negative calls, directed at her. Someone said the Manhattan Institute... was a lobbying firm, and she denied it. Is that true? She made me sick. I tried to call in, but couldn't get through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is this another "journalist" on the WH payroll?
Or she not considered a "journalist"? She certainly sounded like she was on the payroll...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Some Information
Between 1985 and 2001, the Institute received $10,906,767(unadjusted for inflation)in a total of 149 grants from these foundations:

1.Castle Rock Foundation
2.Earhart Foundation
3.JM Foundation
4.Koch Family Foundations(Claude R. Lambe Foundation)
5.John M. Olin Foundation, Inc.
6.Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation
7.Scaife Foundations(Sarah Mellon Scaife, Carthage)
8.Smith Richardson Foundation

Also, the Institute gets financial support from these corporations

1.Bristol-Meyers Squibb
2.Exxon Mobil
3.Chase Manhattan
4.Signa
5.Sprint
6.Reliant Energy
7.Lincoln Financial Group Foundation(formerly Lincoln National Life
Foundation)
8.Merill Lynch

Well, you know the old saying, follow the money!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Position Papers R Us
Need to prove Canadian Drugs are bad, bad, bad...these are the people to call. They'll provide reams of conveluted data that will turn black to white, sell freezers to eskimoes and revise history...all in one fell swoop.

The damn pity is how "legitimate" these whores are made out to be. Many have a Dr. in front of their name or hide behind their former taxpayer funded title (former Ambassador) that creates the smokescreen for the high paid lying these people do.

I wonder how many C-SPAN viewers are alert to how these "foundations" work and see the proliferation of these guests on Washington Journal in recent months. It's as if Brian and his boys are getting some pressure to shine the apple harder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DulceDecorum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. More on the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.
The Manhattan Institute, based in New York City, is supported by the Olin Foundation (grants increasing from $140,000 in 1992 to $205,000 in 1993 and $315,000 in 1994);<49> $275,000 from Bradley between 1990-92;<50> $150,000 from Sarah Scaife in 1992<51> and more than $250,000 from Smith Richardson in 1994<52> The Institute advocates privatization of sanitation services and infrastructure maintenance, deregulation in the area of environmental and consumer protection, school vouchers and cuts in government spending on social welfare programs; it is a preferred source of information for New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani. ....
One common function of these state think tanks is the creation of policy papers for state legislators, which in turn become the basis of legislation, floor statements, press releases, op-eds, and more
http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=2059

Heather Mac Donald is a John M. Olin fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a contributing editor to City Journal. She also is a recipient of 2005 Bradley Prize for Outstanding Intellectual Achievement.
http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/mac_donald.htm

There are significant links between the John M. Olin Foundation and the Olin Corporation, which owns Winchester Ammunition (the largest producer of ammunition in the U.S. and the manufacturer of the infamous "Black Talon" bullet). Olin Corporation at one time also owned Winchester Firearms, a trade name which it now licenses out. Winchester Ammunition stands to reap financial gain from the increased sale of handgun ammunition generated by the passage of lax concealed weapons laws.
http://www.mediatransparency.org/funders/john_m_olin_foundation.htm

By now you may be asking what Heather Mac Donald has to do with the Mayor's welfare policies. Mac Donald is one of several of the Mayor's "advisors" that have emerged from various conservative institutions. Mac Donald is an Olin Fellow at the Manhattan Institute, a right-wing think tank that has been an influential force behind many of the Mayor's harshest initiatives. She has written extensively for the Manhattan Institute's magazine, City Journal, and her work also appears, with increasing frequency, in various other media outlets. Moreover, the Mayor appointed her to the City University of New York (CUNY) Taskforce which was responsible for the attack on remedial education. Yet it is unclear how she's been catapulted to the fore of public debate.
http://www.lincproject.org/organizing/newsletters/archive/WRN/

# Right-wing foundations have developed a truly comprehensive funding strategy, providing grants to a broad range of groups, each promoting right-wing positions to their specific audiences. The grants have created and nurtured an enormous range of organizations all bent on promoting a far-right-wing agenda. Recipients of foundation largesse include the right-wing media; national "think tanks" and advocacy groups; a budding network of regional and state-based think tanks; conservative university programs; conservative college newspapers; conservative scholars and more. In many of these funding areas, progressive and mainstream foundation giving lags far behind.
# Five foundations stand out from the rest: the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, the Koch Family foundations, the John M. Olin Foundation, the Scaife Family foundations and the Adolph Coors Foundation. Each has helped fund a range of far-right programs, including some of the most politically charged work of the last several years.
http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=2052

Total $ Granted
to the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.: $ 16,100,387
http://www.mediatransparency.org/search_results/info_on_any_recipient.php?198

The Manhattan Institute is a 501(C)(3) non-profit organization. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent of the law. As Sponsor, you will receive selected publications and invitations to Manhattan Institute’s special events.
http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/about_mi.htm
http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/trustees.htm

NEW YORK – Another sign of how much New York has changed: The most influential source of political ideas is a conservative think tank that was founded by Margaret Thatcher's mentor and Ronald Reagan's spymaster.
The Manhattan Institute was a speck on the margins of the city's political landscape when it opened in 1978, promoting the un-New Yorkerish notions of free-market economics, conservative values and the dismantling of the welfare state.
http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/_bglobe-conservatives_plant_a_.htm

To qualify as a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, an organization must, according to the Internal Revenue Service website,
be organized and operated exclusively for one or more of the purposes set forth in IRC Section 501(c)(3), and none of the earnings of the organization may inure to any private shareholder or individual. In addition, it may not attempt to influence legislation as a substantial part of its activities and it may not participate at all in campaign activity for or against political candidates.
http://nashuaadvocate.blogspot.com/2005/03/meet-new-boss-same-as-old-boss-brent.html

Tom Wolfe on how the Manhattan Institute changed New York City and America.
http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/_nypost-revolutionaries.htm

Mr. Wriston was also an early trustee of the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank on urbanism that publishes City Journal, which Mayor Giuliani credited with changing the political and policy climate in the city that enabled conservative reforms.
http://daily.nysun.com/Repository/getmailfiles.asp?Style=OliveXLib:ArticleToMail&Type=text/html&Path=NYS/2004/06/22&ID=Ar00102

New Yorkers, in particular, have good reason to be grateful to the Manhattan Institute: Its ideas and proposals formed the basis of Rudy Giuliani's governing philosophy and his determination to challenge the long-accepted notion that New York City was simply ungovernable.
Giuliani - who was first exposed to those ideas at a Manhattan Institute conference on "Rethinking New York" - proved the skeptics wrong. Boy, did he ever.
President Bush, meanwhile, is one of the institute's biggest fans.
Over the years, these pages have been fortunate to have published many of the institute's most important writers: Bylines like those of Heather Mac Donald, E.J. McMahon, Walter Olson, Tamar Jacoby, Diane Ravitch, Charles Murray, Myron Magnet (who edits MI's influential City Journal), Abigail Thernstrom, Floyd Flake and Steven Malanga are well-familiar to Post readers.
http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/_nypost-ideas_matter.htm

They Get What You Pay For: Neo-Conservative New Media Outlets Finance Widespread Scheme to Disseminate G.O.P. Propaganda--With Your Money
http://nashuaadvocate.blogspot.com/2005/03/they-get-what-you-pay-for-neo.html

Our Applied Public Relations Schools, conducted in cooperation with The Leadership Institute, offer communications professionals the continuing training they need to stay current in the continuously changing world of communications. .....
The APR School consists of a brief series of presentations followed by the Game of Spin. The class is divided into "communications divisions" and each team faces a unique communications challenge. Each team then devises its own strategy and tactics to deal with the scenario, and then presents its plan to the rest of the class, with presentations graded by a panel of distinguished PR professionals.
What kind of challenges does Spin offer? Here are a few of the examples of scenarios from past APR Schools:
Your organization has just received a subpoena from a congressional oversight committee for all records related to your expenditures and activities in 1996. The subpoena seeks information regarding anything your group did regarding any issue or individual germane to the U.S. House, Senate or presidential races that year. Your organization is a not-for-profit group that is not permitted to engage in political activity. The scope of the subpoena will require your organization to significantly enlarge your dependency on outside counsel. The subpoena is received at your group’s office at 3:15 p.m. on Thursday.
Imagine planning the news conference for that scenario!
http://www.therightvoice.org/aprs/default.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. She was on Cspan in January defending torture
Edited on Tue May-03-05 09:53 AM by bloom
arguing for it. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. yeah, I was wondering how much money she was being paid to

shill for the bushgang?

and just who is paying her.

she really thinks well of herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgrrrll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Oh good grief the Scaife's and the Olin's? Can't go much further right
than those two. Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. I Almost Forgot . . . She Suggested bu$h Go On A "Patriot" Act Tour
Edited on Tue May-03-05 12:36 PM by Dinger
Can ou imagine that? Just like the SS/BS tour? Sounds good to me! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC