Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bolton Often Blocked Information, Officials Say (from Powell, Rice)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 10:47 AM
Original message
Bolton Often Blocked Information, Officials Say (from Powell, Rice)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61304-2005Apr17.html


John R. Bolton -- who is seeking confirmation as the next U.S. ambassador to the United Nations -- often blocked then-Secretary of State Colin L. Powell and, on one occasion, his successor, Condoleezza Rice, from receiving information vital to U.S. strategies on Iran, according to current and former officials who have worked with Bolton.

In some cases, career officials found back channels to Powell or his deputy, Richard L. Armitage, who encouraged assistant secretaries to bring information directly to him. In other cases, the information was delayed for weeks or simply did not get through. The officials, who would discuss the incidents only on the condition of anonymity because some continue to deal with Bolton on other issues, cited a dozen examples of memos or information that Bolton refused to forward during his four years as undersecretary of state for arms control and international security.

Two officials described a memo that had been prepared for Powell at the end of October 2003, ahead of a critical international meeting on Iran, informing him that the United States was losing support for efforts to have the U.N. Security Council investigate Iran's nuclear program. Bolton allegedly argued that it would be premature to throw in the towel. "When Armitage's staff asked for information about what other countries were thinking, Bolton said that information couldn't be collected," according to one official with firsthand knowledge of the exchange.
-snip-
--------------------------------

he must have enemies ten deep

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
American in Asia Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ummm....yeah....maybe...
and your point is what???? That Bolton IS qualified??? And if so, why do you think so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. yeah...riiiiiight. THAT"S the reason to oppose him: jealousy.
Has nothing to do with him being a dangerous wingnut.

Nope, just people jealous of his cute moustache.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. but we are not talking about everybody, we are talking only about

Bolton and his misconduct and enemies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. John Bolton is a political partisan manipulator and does not....
...belong in a position as sensitive as United Nations U.S. Ambassador since no nation would believe or trust anything this man would have to say. Given that Bolton has both the capacity and force of self-will to lie I further believe that he has no business representing the United States government at any level!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC