Gannon/Guckert IS 47 years old...

[roseBudd]

[NYCGirl]

1. Your point? NT

[roseBudd]

3. All the Gannon is kidnap victim Gosch people clung to the belief

he was much younger so he could be Gosch. I tried to say in one of the Gannon wrinkles threads that I believed he was 47 and was shut down.

[trudyco]

2. Is this a follow up on another thread?

Haven't seen much on him in awhile. Where did you get the pic? In this one he has a mole like in the young Guckert photo, but not in other photos.

Has he made any appearances lately, like for promoting a book or anything?

[roseBudd]

4. Just found a link to this interview on NY Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/20/magazine/20QUESTIONS.html?adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1111441167-iRtAAnWvrKp6k3EVcxRu/w

my what an idiot he is.

[trudyco]

7. I have to subscribe - snippets????

[roseBudd]

8. here

Scott McClellan, the press secretary to President Bush, called on you and allowed you to ask questions on a nearly daily basis. What, exactly, is your relationship with him?

I was just another guy in the press room. Did I try to curry favor with him? Sure. When he got married, I left a wedding card for him in the press office. People are saying this proves there is some link. But as Einstein said, "Sometimes a wedding card is just a wedding card.''

You mean like "sometimes a cigar is just a cigar''? That wasn't Einstein. That was Freud.

Oh, Freud. O.K. I got my old Jewish men confused.

You should learn the difference between them if you want to work in journalism.

I'd like to get back into journalism. I'm hoping someone will offer me a job as a commentator or one of those political analysts that you see on the news shows all the time.

[roseBudd]

9. He was also on Tucker Carlson here is the transcript link...

http://www.pbs.org/tuckercarlson/thisweek/plus2_transcripts.html

and Carlson lets him lie...

Carlson: Jeff Gannon.com your website is owned by the same person or company that owns a couple of websites with pornographic sounding nargese military stud.com or whatever got a lot of press. I'm not going to ask about those sites beyond what they apparently are. Here's my question. Isn't it obvious to you that that's sort of discrediting in the eyes of a lot of other people? Why would you have any tie at all, if you want to be a mainstream journalist or -- regardless, a legitimate journalist, to websites with names like that?

Gannon: First of all, people misunderstand what those names represented. They're just website names, domain names. Years ago I was doing website development and these names were reserved for a private client. They were never hosted. Nothing was ever on them. And as we know on the internet, things never disappear. These are all things that are from a long time ago that people have dug up just to destroy my credibility and damage my reputation.

[sui generis]

5. so this Gannon Wrinkles thing is LITERALLY gannon wrinkles

:evilgrin:

[Clark2008]

6. Yipes!! You should have put up a "graphic photo" warning.

:scared:

[SpiralHawk]

10. So that's what a "top" looks like?

Or is he a bottom?

I have no clue whatsoever, since I am anti-hierarchy all the way, Genuinely E-gal-atarian and as Independent as a hog on ice skates.

Republicans have some mighty peculiar ideas about what it means to make love.