Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More Bush Hypocrisy: Signed Bill Allowing Deaths Of Vegetative Patients

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 11:08 PM
Original message
More Bush Hypocrisy: Signed Bill Allowing Deaths Of Vegetative Patients
Edited on Sat Mar-19-05 11:09 PM by Opposite Reaction
Found on Kos, from a post on Eschaton:

"A patient's inability to pay for medical care combined with a prognosis that renders further care futile are two reasons a hospital might suggest cutting off life support, the chief medical officer at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital said Monday."

Sez Atrios: "In 1999 then governor Bush signed a law which allowed hospitals to withdraw life support from patients, over the objections of the family, if they consider the treatment to be nonbeneficial."

What I do not see in either of these blog posts, or the discussions that follow, is the bill number, law number, law name or any way to look it up. I don't doubt it's existance, I just wanna link to it.

Any help?


Edit: crappy code.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. None of those politicians...
Really care for Terry. This is just to pacify their base, and distract us from the horrors in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AWJackRWN Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree
These candidates are taking advantage of this overexposure by the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is this it??
Edited on Sat Mar-19-05 11:39 PM by rainbow4321
Trying to Google it and found this..

http://www.premack.com/columns/1999/990604.htm

The 76th Legislature closed its regular session on May 31, 1999. It considered hundreds of proposals, and voted to make many of them into law. Several important bills affecting Seniors are in line to become law. One of them is called the "Advance Directives Act."
Governor Bush vetoed a similar bill that was passed by the 75th Legislature in 1997. According to the Governor’s office, he vetoed the 1997 bill because it contained "several provisions that would permit a physician to deny life-sustaining procedures to a patient who desires them."


The bill you refer to was SB 1260, and it did pass both houses of the Texas legislature. Governor Bush was required to veto or sign it before June 20, 1999 – and he returned from a campaign trip just in time to sign the bill into law. Its effective date is September 1, 1999, so we have about two more weeks under the old laws before the new statute takes over.



http://www.premack.com/columns/1999/990813.htm

The bill you refer to was SB 1260, and it did pass both houses of the Texas legislature. Governor Bush was required to veto or sign it before June 20, 1999 – and he returned from a campaign trip just in time to sign the bill into law. Its effective date is September 1, 1999, so we have about two more weeks under the old laws before the new statute takes over. The new statute is called the Texas "Advance Directives Act." It could have a profound effect on Seniors and anyone else who finds themselves caught in the cogs of the health care establishment. The law updates three important but outdated statutes: the Natural Death law, the Health Care Power of Attorney law, and the Do-Not-Resuscitate law.


The new statute liberalizes the situations under which you can avoid artificial life support. Under it, life support can be withheld or withdrawn if you have a terminal condition that is expected to cause your death within six months. The old law required death to be "imminent" or due shortly. This allows you, as a patient, to avoid life support at an earlier date and gives you more control over the final months of life.

The new statute also authorizes you to avoid artificial life support if you have an "irreversible condition" from which you are expected to die. There is no time limit imposed by the new statute. Theoretically, this could be used to remove life support from a comatose patient, even if life support could have maintained the vital signs for years.

There was a potential legal conflict if you signed both a Directive and a Health Care Power of Attorney under the old laws. In both documents, you could choose surrogate decision-makers in case you became too ill to care for yourself. If your decision-makers were two different people, they could argue about your health care. The Advance Directives Act consolidates the laws, eliminating this conflict by requiring your decision-makers to follow the instructions you give in your Directive. A new disclosure provision also warns you to select the same person as decision-maker in both documents.


----------------------------
edited for extra link


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think that is it. Many thanks!! n/m
n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC