Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Today is Moveon Call in Day

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 10:32 AM
Original message
Today is Moveon Call in Day
Today Wednesday, March 16th, movon.org has organized a call-in day to your Senators regarding the ‘nuclear option’. This would take away with the filibuster and the need for 60 votes to get right wing judges through. All that would be needed are 50 votes plus Cheney.

Dozens of lifetime appointments to the Federal courts would be granted and it would pave the way for an even more radical Supreme Court.

So please call your Senator tomorrow and let them know that we are still a people who demand a democratic process and we want a system of checks and balances. These judges should be there to uphold the law and not a partisan, right wing view. If they get in we can expect to see worker’s rights, civil rights, environmental, and women’s rights laws overturned.

Will this work? Will it really do anything to change any minds? I have no idea but what I do know is this issue is one of the most important; the problem won’t go away with an election if they get on the bench. We have to know in our hearts that we tried to do something, we have to let our Senators know that there are people in the country that know what is going on and we don’t like it. I don’t want to wake up one day and say I should have done something. The time is now to act.


The 20 nominees Bush has resubmitted were rejected because of their extreme positions in favor of corporate interests and against civil rights, the environment, civil liberties, and the concerns of ordinary Americans. Here's a brief summary of just the first four to be considered.

William Myers III has never been a judge and spent most of his career as a lobbyist for the cattle and mining industry. He has written that all habitat conservation laws are unconstitutional because they interfere with potential profit. In 2001, Bush appointed him as the chief lawyer for the Department of the Interior. In that role he continued as a champion of corporate interests, setting his agenda in meetings with former employers he promised not to speak with, and even illegally giving away sacred Native American land to be strip mined.

Terrence Boyle was a legal aide to Jesse Helms. As a judge, his signature decisions have attempted to circumvent federal laws barring employment discrimination by race, gender, and disability. His rulings have been overturned a staggering 120 times by the conservative 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, either due to gross errors in judgment or simple incompetence.

William Pryor Jr. served as Attorney General of Alabama, where he took money from Phillip Morris, fought against the anti-tobacco lawsuit until it was almost over, and cost the people of Alabama billions in settlement money for their healthcare system as a result. He called Roe v. Wade "the worst abomination of constitutional law in our history," and has consistently argued against the federal protections for the civil rights of minorities, lesbian and gay couples, women, and the disabled.

William Haynes III served as the chief legal council for the Defense Department, where he championed the outrageous legal theories that led to the torture at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay. Haynes also developed the "enemy combatant" doctrine, which allows for United States citizens to be detained without trial, due process, or access to a lawyer -- forever -- at the sole discretion of the president.

http://www.moveonpac.org /



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not one DUer
cares enough about our courts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I Did!
Happy to do it!:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks
I really thought this would get a better response. It's so important. They could pack those courts so even if we win an election we'll have these judges working against us for decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Think we could call them "activist judges?" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm going t to be handing
out flyers in front of the PO this afternoon in a fairly repuke area. I'm going to present this as it can go both ways, if the dems get back in the same thing could happen to them. The courts should be non partisan and not 'activist'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Multi-task
There is alot going on. But we need to take a few minutes to give all of them attention. This is important too.

You'd probably get further posting Dean's email though. Although it is a little incoherent to me, I think he's talking about the nuclear option, but not really sure.

"..We have to act. Sign this petition, which we will deliver to every U.S. Senator, asking them to protect the right to free speech in the Senate. If they don't, it is not only their voice that will be silenced -- it will be ours:

http://www.democrats.org/freespeech

Here are the facts: George Bush has appointed judges to lifetime positions at a better rate than any president in nearly three decades. More than 95% of his nominees have been approved. Only ten nominees have been refused -- all because they are unqualified and out of the mainstream..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC