Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did out of state volunteers help Dean in Iowa at all?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 09:37 AM
Original message
Did out of state volunteers help Dean in Iowa at all?
This column was interesting to me. It was written by David Yepsen, who I really think tends to be a closet RW, but nonetheless, knows the state's politics better than almost anyone. This column isn't a critique of the message though, but the campaigns.

Okay I know some people out there traveled to IA to help Dean. What are your thoughts?

Dick Gephardt had a lot of labor unions. Dean had some key unions, too, and the largest campaign operation ever built in the state. In many ways, it was the best because of the enthusiasm and dedication of its volunteers. But, obviously, it wasn't as good as it needed to be. One problem was that it was staffed by a lot of young people from out of state. While everyone can respect their energy, it's just not the same as having your neighbors coming up and asking you to help their candidate.

(It's also pretty clear from the results that some Dean people should have been doing something better with their time than standing in the cold on street corners Monday waving signs. You going to follow the presidential suggestions of someone too dumb to come in out of the cold? Not in Iowa.)

...
Kerry's campaign had a better organization than it let on. It estimated 130,000 people would show up at the caucuses - about 123,000 actually did - and went about finding enough people to win in a turnout of that size. Even during the dark months of the campaign, Kerry's Iowa manager, John Norris, said he didn't care about problems in the national office, he just wanted his staff to focus on building their "hard count." They did and it worked. Norris & Co. put together groups of individual firefighters and veterans, particularly Vietnam veterans, to help Kerry. Having hometown people such as local firefighters or veterans stand up for Kerry in caucuses proved a lot more persuasive to other Iowans than some California Deaniac working the sidelines.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Badger1 Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. My parents
My parents live in Des Moines and are very active Dems. They have supported Kerry since the begining. My mom got a personal letter from some Dr. in California urging her to support Dean and my dad (a vet) got two from vets out west. Iowans are very independent and take the caucus seriously. They said they took some offense at "outsiders" telling them how to vote. Others in their neighborhood made similar comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. there certainly were some new faces last week
here in IA. I'd tend to kind of agree with your analysis of Iowans too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. I knocked on doors in Iowa for Dean. First, don't ever forget that when
a RWer ridicules people for "standing around with signs" it's because they want people to stay inside glued to their FOX news consuming ads for Wal-Mart. They don't want them out in the streets participating and shaping American democracy--that's for rich oliarchs like the BFEE to do--so we can dispense of that criticism right there.

A lot of things came together to work against Dr. Dean in the final days of the campaign--Gephardt's attack ads that forced Dean to either ignore them (bad) or respond to them (worse). The old tape of Dean claiming caucusus were controlled by special interests, which is ABSOLUTELY true in the past, didn't help him.

The part of the Dean campaign I was involved in focused intensively on registered Democrats who were just getting blitzed and blasted with campaigning from every side. I think all the attention just made a lot of people turn off ALL the appeals. Some of us were wondering if our time wouldn't have been better spent just going to a sports bar or a mall somewhere and trying to get the message out to new or non voters.

Also, there were a few glitches--campaigners sometimes covering the same street for instance as two different groups were sent to the same area. That's inevitable, but still we could have done better with the logistics at times.

As for the war whoop "gaffe," that is absolutely nuthin' and shows the depths to which the popular media will sink to try to stop an outsiders grassroots campaign. Their mantra is "maintain the status quo at all costs. We have the information and power, and we dole it out for money to the sheeple who consume it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. thanks!
Why didn't organization = votes? That's the one missing link here...any successful close campaign is won with GOTV and organization. Dean had the best our state has EVER seen.

I agree with your most of your analysis about what happened. The negative ads were WAY TOO MUCH! I ended up going edwards as my 2nd choice, mostly because of his lack of attack ads and lit pieces. (and I like his 2 Americas theme)

I WOULD agree with David Yepsen, though, that the best way to get folks to the caucuses is NOT to stand on street corners. When only 6% of the population votes...that's just a waste of personel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windansea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. not according to this report
"Who Let the Blogs Out? Alert emailer "Andrew" offers an explanation of Dean's Iowa loss: "The decline in Dean's numbers in Iowa coincided with the arrival of his vaunted 3500 ground troops," who alienated Iowa voters. The Deaniacs were too opinionated and wouldn't shut up-- i.e., they were slightly crazed. Dean would have done better without them. As Andrew, a Dean supporter, put it: "I wouldn't want to let a lot of these folk into my house." ... It's just a theory, but note that it would explain the loss and the scream (which was Dean getting into their 'head'). ... People who were actually in Iowa should feel free to tell me if the theory rings true--though if Joe Trippi starts asking Dean volunteers to stay away from New Hampshire and "work on the Web," that would also constitute confirmation. ... P.S.: kf reader "T.C." proposed this scenario the week before the caucuses. ("Nothing like a bunch of young, smug, condescending, messianic, coastal elites to remind Iowans of why they don't like easterners.")"

http://slate.msn.com/id/2094126/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I find Dean supporters I've met
Edited on Thu Jan-22-04 10:34 AM by Ficus
very nice. But I didn't meet them all, and I'm also an 23 year old. Perhaps with some of the older voters the last quote is true.

"Nothing like a bunch of young, smug, condescending, messianic, coastal elites to remind Iowans of why they don't like easterners."

on edit: I love the east coast!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windansea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I am sure lots of Dean supporters are nice
but it sounds like Iowans got a little fed up with the barrage of phone calls and knocks on their doors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logansquare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. Ah, and the orange hats
Designed to, I guess, show them how many of our folks were out there. Did anyone think that it might look like an invading army? I'm hoping the campaign learns and grows from this. Kerry's brilliant recovery is proof that even campaigns that appear DOA can be revived.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC