Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Howard Kurtz shouldn't be the one to talk; esp. re: Gannon/Guckert

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 07:24 PM
Original message
Why Howard Kurtz shouldn't be the one to talk; esp. re: Gannon/Guckert
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 07:34 PM by blondeatlast
I started a post earlier this morning, and have seen others throughout the day, that indicated many were unfamiliar with the reason Howard Kurts is a HYPOCRITICAL whore.

It all has to do with his wife; MSNBC "analyst" Shari Annis.

In brief: He is anything but objective. Here's a good assessment of the situation:

(snip)
“It’s ironic that Kurtz would suggest a conflict of interest between a couple. Kurtz is married to Sheri Annis, who is a GOP public relations strategist supporting the re-election of George W. Bush. Annis also was part of Arnold Schwartzneggar’s brain trust in his recall election. She also worked on a California voter proposition that would force immigrant children to speak English in school. She appears regularly on Chris Matthews’s “Hardball” program as a conservative pundit and writes for the National Review. She also worked on a campaign to stop “living wage” laws. She even calls her company Fourth Estate Strategies.

Not a bad idea, of course, when your husband is a prominent member of the Fourth Estate as a Washington Post columnist whose work is seen daily and, in another bit of irony, hosts CNN’s Reliable Sources, which is a program that is supposed to look critically at the media, his Post being one of the 800 lbs. gorillas of the industry.

(more)

http://commonwealthcommonsense.typepad.com/commonwealthcommonsense/2004/06/howard_kurtz_ba.html

It should put his behavior re: Guckert/Gannon in a whole new light for the uninitiated.

Edit: I also posted this because right now, I think he's vulnerable. I WANT HIM EXPOSED--and jobless, frankly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Totally agree, he should NOT be touted as being someone
with any credibility to comment on this scandal. If he had ANY ethics he would 'recuse' himself but, seeing as he has none, he should be forced out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC