Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Labor Unions Examine Political Operations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 11:57 AM
Original message
Labor Unions Examine Political Operations
By LEIGH STROPE
ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON (AP) -

Organized labor is taking a hard look at its political influence and voter turnout operations after the two union-backed candidates that were to dominate the Iowa caucuses sank instead.

Unions were to be the powerhouse in Iowa, with white-collars for Howard Dean and blue-collars for Dick Gephardt. But in a stunning upset, they emerged battered in third- and fourth-place behind Sens. John Kerry and John Edwards.

Leaders of industrial unions that formed a coalition supporting Gephardt, called Americans for Economic Justice, were to confer Wednesday to assess what happened in Iowa and map out a political future.

But already, union leaders say the lesson from Iowa is that organized labor remains split over which Democrat is best suited to challenge President Bush in November. Of the 64 unions in the AFL-CIO, less than half were committed to a candidate.

more: http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/bw-elect/2004/jan/20/012005055.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. The matter of union support
In the old days, the union bosses could say "You will support Candidate X because he's good for labor," and the rank and file would dutifully go to their caucus or precinct and vote accordingly.

In 1988, when Gephardt last ran in Iowa, a lot of the union oldtimers were still around. Sixteen years later, it's a whole new generation out there, and they don't want to be herded.

In the past few weeks, I saw a couple of threads from union members lamenting the fact that their union bosses had chosen to endorse a candidate whom they didn't agree with, all without any input from the rank and file.

I think that if unions are to retain their political clout, they will have to endorse candidates ONLY after making sure that a majority of their members actually approve. Otherwise, a union endorsement will mean about as much as an endorsement from a Cub Scout troop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Post 9-11 the Fire Fighters was the BIG endorsement.
I am amazed that so many underestimated their power. Kerry EARNED their endorsement in every way possible.

They will help Kerry win big in Nov., too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. The white collars sold the blue collars out
The white collars have - so far - been immune from offshoring and exporting jobs. The AFSCME, government workers, don't have much to lose from "free trade" and neither do the SEIU. That's why it was so jarring to see them get behind Dean, who had actually attended the signing of NAFTA - just as disgusting as Gephardt's Rose Garden appearance with Bush.

Now of course, all the white collar workers who sold out their blue collar brothers and sisters are getting outsourced, insourced, and offshored too. Some AFSCME unions - like the prison guards - endorsed Bush, and got rewarded by the DSH anti-union proposals. In any case, I don't expect much from the AFSCME, but the SEIU - how could you?

The labor movement is dead if the split over "protectionism" and blue vs. white doesn't heal soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Good points.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC