Yes, indeed Rove is that. He might well one day be considered the person that caused the downfall of American society. You don't really think * could of accomplished all this w/o THIS evil mastermind do you? * is just the guy that carries the message, and the media wants to leave us w/ the impression Rove was just *'s lacky. The fact the media wants to leave this message to the world only proves that they are just as interested in getting their names down in the history books as * and his administration is. They really don't care whether it is for good or bad.
Glad to see that people are getting on board with just how much influence Rove has. I agree that he has a lot and that it's all negative. I consider him and Dick Cheney the 2 most despicable people in the US. Rumsfeld is in there as well. Bush is just their lackey so he gets a bit of a break for now.
As I post frequently, I can only hope that some journalist somewhere will grow a spine and REALLY investigate what happened in Florida in 2000 re: the phony felon list. Then it'll be bye bye Rove. AND his flunky, the President.
his fathers administration. The real brains behind the presidency of both of these administrations are evil to the bone. That is, in part, why I'm truly afraid that * will be removed and Cheney will take over. When I watched him in the debates w/ Edwards I could see the EVIL in his eyes from the minute the camera found his ugly mug! His opening comment was all it took for all the sheeple to tune out everything Edwards said from that point on. While I thought Edwards did an excellant job at that debate, it was to no avail. Cheney is the sheeple's hero. They loved him in the Gulf War "movie." They were mesmerized by his pyrotechnics show!
11. I read on another site that "Kelly" of Time is considering "Bloggers"
I went to Time website, and emailed them. Why doesn't everyone? I mean, what have we got to lose. They have until 8:00 a.m. tomorrow to reveal their choice. And it's either nominate ourselves, OR Karl Rove. Should be an easy choice.
After all, "Bloggers" ARE the wave of TRUE future news! We ARE the newsmakers, much as they hate to admit it.
15. For the last time, Person of the Year is NOT an award
It's meant to be the person who had the most impact on world events in a year. Of course, often they cop out - the last three years have been ridiculous.
But it's perfectly reasonable to make Bush the person of the year b/c he's president, he just won reelection, and whether or not you like him, he's had a major impact on the world. A negative impact, but an impact nevertheless.
For instance, Osama should definitely have been person of the year in 2001 b/c he'd obviously had the biggest impact on the year's events.
18. If it is Chimpus Khan, I agree. He deserves it.
No one of the face of the earth has had more impact on more people's lives than this man. Now, if it is Rove, then Time is looking at the real power behind King Khan, but would be right in line with my sentiments.
Time has never held that their "Man of the Year" was a positive statement.
The fact is, from domestic American issues, to the War in Iraq(tm), to the trade impabalance, to environmental issues, to human rights issues, to impact on world travel policies, to the exchange rate of the dollar, Great Leader's influence is felt worldwide. None of it good, to be sure, but certainly front and center in most people's thinking.
He is likely to be seen by history as the most reviled world leader since Hitler, and that's no small feat. Given enough time, he could be on a course to even exceed Hitler.
Can anyone name a person who has had more impact than this? Anyone?
Time Magazine is owned by Time-Warner, who also owns CNN who fixed our primaries, trashed Kerry and protected their native son, Bush.
Guess the election is over and Time-Warner (parent Co. of CNN) has settled on paying the SEC 510 Million dollars as a settlement stemming from the Income Stock/advertising AOL fraud case that the Gov. has been hanging over their heads for the last 1.5 years.
To be honest, I don't give a rat's ass who Time Magazine selects; what Time Magazine thinks; nor what they report. It's all bullshit and propaganda anyways. I'll leave it up to the Sheeples to find this "person of the year" turd food to be interesting and thought provoking. Me....I've got a loooooonnnnnnnnnggggggggggg memory.
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/latimests/2004... Time Warner Settles AOL Fraud Charges Thu Dec 16, 7:55 AM ET Media giant Time Warner Inc. agreed Wednesday to pay $510 million to settle government charges of accounting fraud at its troubled America Online unit, freeing the company to use its stock for acquisitions.
settlement would remove the uncertainty clouding the future of the world's largest entertainment company, accused by regulators of inflating the advertising revenue of its Internet service provider.
Wall Street had been expecting a deal, because Time Warner set aside $500 million last month to resolve problems with the government. Time Warner stock has climbed more than 15% since.
The two-pronged agreement would be with both the Justice Department (news - web sites) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (news -web sites). It must be approved by SEC commissioners.
Wall Street analysts had been prepared a year ago for the accounting debacle to cost Time Warner as much as $4 billion in penalties and litigation. But Chief Executive Richard Parsons took a hard stance with regulators, refusing to admit guilt even though that might have more quickly resolved the investigations.
31. It would be Bush's second...just like Joe Stalin and Deng Xiaoping!
1927- Charles Lindbergh 1928- Walter Chrysler 1929- Owen Young 1930- Mahatma Gandhi 1931- Pierre Laval 1932- Franklin Delano Roosevelt 1933- Hugh Johnson 1934- Franklin Delano Roosevelt (2nd time) 1935- Haile Selassie 1936- Wallis Simpson 1937- Chiang Kai-Shek and Soong May-ling 1938- Adolf Hitler 1939- Joseph Stalin 1940- Winston Churchill 1941- Franklin Delano Roosevelt (3rd time) 1942- Joseph Stalin (2nd time) 1943- George Marshall 1944- Dwight Eisenhower 1945- Harry Truman 1946- James F. Byrnes 1947- George Marshall (2nd time) 1948- Harry Truman (2nd time) 1949- Winston Churchill (2nd time) 1950- The American Fighting-Man 1951- Mohammed Mossadegh 1952- Queen Elizabeth II 1953- Konrad Adenauer 1954- John Dulles 1955- Harlow Curtice 1956- Hungarian Freedom Fighter 1957- Nikita Khrushchev 1958- Charles De Gaulle 1959- Dwight Eisenhower (2nd time) 1960- U.S. scientists 1961- John F. Kennedy 1962- Pope John XXIII 1963- Martin Luther King Jr. 1964- Lyndon Johnson 1965- William Westmoreland 1966- Twenty-Five and Under 1967- Lyndon Johnson (2nd time) 1968- Frank Borman, Jim Lovell, William Anders 1969- The Middle Americans 1970- Willy Brandt 1971- Richard Nixon 1972- Richard Nixon (2nd time) and Henry Kissinger 1973- John Sirica 1974- King Faisal 1975- American Women 1976- Jimmy Carter 1977- Anwar Sadat 1978- Deng Xiaoping 1979- Ayatollah Khomeini 1980- Ronald Reagan 1981- Lech Walesa 1982- The Computer 1983- Ronald Reagan (2nd time) and Yuri Andropov 1984- Peter Ueberroth 1985- Deng Xiaoping (2nd time) 1986- Corazon Aquino 1987- Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev 1988- Endangered Earth ("Planet of the Year") 1989- Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev (2nd time) 1990- George H. W. Bush 1991- Ted Turner 1992- Bill Clinton 1993- Nelson Mandela, F.W. de Klerk, Yasser Arafat, and Yitzhak Rabin 1994- Pope John Paul II 1995- Newt Gingrich 1996- David Ho 1997- Andy Grove 1998- Bill Clinton (2nd time) and Kenneth Starr 1999- Jeffrey P. Bezos 2000- George W. Bush 2001- Rudolph Giuliani 2002- The whistleblowers: Cynthia Cooper of Worldcom, Sherron Watkins of Enron, and Coleen Rowley of the FBI 2003- The American Soldier
33. TIME is a good dose of bullshit. OBL not being person of the year
was a cope out. That man is responsible for this out of control country just as much as *. The new classification for being person of the year is now whoever is the best person that can help sell some magazines.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.