Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RightWHINE Party total hypocrisy; Filibusters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 06:11 AM
Original message
RightWHINE Party total hypocrisy; Filibusters
Edited on Wed Nov-17-04 06:14 AM by LynnTheDem
Wahhh wahhh wahhh cry the rightWHINEnut babies. Bad mean ol' Democrats are using their legal right to *gasp* FILIBUSTER bush's nominations!

What the rightwhinenuts don't, of course, point out is that IN FACT (they hate them pesky things!) RIGHTWHINENUTS have done FAR MORE filibusters than the Dems:

Only two of bush's nominees have faced cloture votes - and these cloture votes have been public roll call votes, not the secret holds that Republicans used to block dozens of President Clinton's nominees.

More than 60 of President Clinton's nominees were not given hearings or votes in Committee, and others were filibustered or waited years to receive hearings.

bush sent his first group of judicial nominees to the Senate on May 9, 2001. Two years later, 123 of his nominees have been confirmed - 100 of them by a Democratic-led Senate in the 107th Congress.

Rightwhiners created a judicial vacancy crisis by refusing to act on more than half (56 percent) of President Clinton's circuit court nominees in 1999 and 2000, and by refusing to confirm a single appellate judge in 1996.

http://democrats.senate.gov/~dpc/pubs/108-1-179.html

According to the Congressional Research Service, between 1980 and 2000, before the start of the current Bush administration, cloture motions were filed on ten lower court nominations. As recently as 2000, cloture votes were necessary to obtain votes on President Clinton’s nominations of both Richard Paez and Marsha Berzon to the Ninth Circuit; President Clinton’s nomination of Lee Sarokin to the Third Circuit was openly filibustered as well.

Sixty-three of President Clinton’s judicial nominees never even made it out of the Judiciary Committee.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was among those voting against cloture on the Paez nomination, and then voted to indefinitely postpone a vote on the nomination after cloture was invoked. Hypocritically, with a Republican in the White House, Senator Frist now says that “If filibusters are going to be made part of the judicial nominee process, I think you will see increasing discussion over whether the rules should be changed

http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=16955

That's the "MORAL VALUES" of the rightwhinenuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. When Clinton was President . . .
. . . the Chief Judge in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit had a sign placed in the lobby of the Courthouse telling entrants how many vacancies the Congress had blocked in that Circuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MSgt213 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Just like they are the only ones that can use lawyers to sue anyone else
is filing frivolous lawsuits tying up the courts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC