a :wtf: moment -- driving to work yesterday, I heard this "snippet" on the radio
speech transcript snippet: President's Remarks in New Mexico
Alamogordo High School -- Alamogordo, New Mexico -- Oct. 24, 2004
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/10/20041024-1.htmlWe have a different point of view when it comes to defending America. Senator Kerry now calls Iraq a diversion. But the case of just one terrorist shows how wrong his thinking is.
A man named Zarqawi is responsible for planting car bombs and beheading Americans in Iraq. He ran a terrorist training camp in Afghanistan, until coalition forces arrived. (Applause.) And then he fled to Iraq, where he's fighting us today. He swore his allegiance to Osama bin Laden. If Zarqawi and his associates were not busy fighting Iraqi and American forces in Iraq, what does Senator Kerry think they would be doing? Peaceful, small business owners? (Laughter.) Running a benevolent society? (Laughter.) ------------------
so is bush* saying we invaded Iraq to give Zarqawi something to do? and what makes bush* think that while
"Zarqawi and his associates were not busy fighting Iraqi and American forces in Iraq" isn't also making other plans?