|
We should have knocked this one out of the ballpark by now. We have SOOOO much ammunition. There is literally no evidence that * was ever brave at any time or in any situation, either before or after he was selected. And yet... you still get these swing voters or undecideds (yes! some polls put them at 10% even at this late date!), saying that * is "steadfast" or "has shown bravery" in the war on terror! Where is this coming from?
In my discussions with this type of voter during my canvassing, it seems to boil down to one thing: that ridiculous photo-op with the bullhorn right after 9-11. I always thought that was pathetic, and I clearly remember that it did not impress people immediately. Mark Shields thought it was unimpressive, and said so on Crossfire at the time. Novak didn't put up much of an argument at the time. But since then, my God, it's been turned into the bravest thing a President has ever done by our corporate media! AND THERE WAS NOTHING BRAVE ABOUT IT!! It was zero, nada, nothing.
Add this to his AWOL military career, and his fear of horses, and his fear of press conferences, and his fear of John Kerry, and what do you have? You have the chimp in chief: a total loser who let 9-11 happen on his watch and will not keep us safe. I'd really like to hear someone saying this. If Kerry loses (I don't think he will!) by one or two percentage points, it could be because of this myth, and we still have time to debunk it!
|