Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Indira Singh re Flight 93

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 08:37 AM
Original message
Indira Singh re Flight 93
PFA "Guns and Butter"
Interviews with Indira Singh
http://www.kpfa.org/archives/archives.php?id=13&limit=N
"Ground Zero 911, Blueprint For Terror, Part Two" July 20th 2005
http://www.kpfa.org/cgi-bin/gen-mpegurl.m3u?server=209.81.10.18&port=80&file=dummy.m3u&mount=/data/20050720-Wed1400.mp3 (mp3)

(ca 29 minutes into the interview)

Indira Singh:
"...the fighter to Pennsylvania was scrambled in time, because we have firsthand proof, you know, whistleblowers within the correct organizations, that that was shot down. You know, it’s just that “Let’s Roll” was a better story, perhaps a story that the American people could handle, but, no, I was told at Ground Zero that day, we heard them go over, and we knew they were shot down. We were told. It was just later that it, we’re told that the passengers brought it down. Well, if you’re running a country and you’re really under terrorist attack, that might be the way to go. Empower people by saying if this, that thing happens to you, get up and do something and have a story. I really don’t have such a big problem with that, but the fact of the matter is, that it was shot down.

B.F.: Oh, and that’s interesting. And you heard that on the day of September 11th?

I.S.: Yes, I did. And it was corroborated a couple of weeks ago, by people who were in a particular situation room."


complete transcript of part 2
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=103&topic_id=142316
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, I've heard so many rumors that flight 93 was shot down. The problem
is the crash site looks nothing like what you would expect for a shot down plane. It looks like a bomb went off there, the plane is GONE. If flight 93 was shot down, it was shot down somewhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. losing an engine due to missile could make plane dive
the missile might not damage the plane much other than bringing it down due to loss of engine.

But there was debris scattered over an 8 mile area, including across a lake and mountains

Donn de Grande-Pre also said he knew that the plane was shot down and others in military or with military connections said they were aware the plane was shot down.
http://www.flcv.com/offcom93.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The Book "True Lies"
recounts an independent trip to Shanksville.

Important points from their narrative:

1. There was no fuel in the groundwater at the crash site, nor did
the crash set off a grass fire.

2. A MSM reporter from Philadelphia who did an independent
investigation explains the news media's hostility to the "shot down"
hypothesis by pointing out that they are so fond of the "let's roll"
story just the way it is that they don't want to see it challenged or
altered no matter what the facts are.

3. The writers interviewed someone who was reputed to have claimed he
saw the plane shot down but who, after spending all day with the FBI,
changed his story. In this interview the witness simply blandly
recounted the official story, with frequent breaks to have whispered
conversations with his wife.


Dr. Griffin points out that it appears the flight 93 passengers were
just about to breach the cockpit door, and that among the passengers
was a pilot qualified to land the plane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I've seen it said that a new flight plan was requested and approved
three minutes before the plane crashed. Who could have and would
have requested a new flight plan under the circumstances of the
fight for control of the cabin?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC