BBC reported WTC7 falling some 20 minutes early.

[balantz]

The BBC news report on 9/11 had information of WTC7 collapsing some twenty minutes before the actual event.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqqhX8gkhE0

Around 16 minutes into this film you can watch the BBC reporter talking about bldg. # 7 having already collapsed but in her background the bldg. is still standing. The satellite transmission is interrupted 5 minutes before the actual collapse time.

Has this been covered in this forum before?

[Bolo Boffin]

1. Yes.

The fire department had determined that the building was in danger of falling by 2:30. They pulled all of their people from a possible collapse zone. It was a controversial move because the firefighters were looking for survivors.

The BBC made a simple mistake on a confusing and chaotic day.

[petgoat]

2. We've discussed it some.

One interesting point is that BBC now claims they
can't locate the tape in their archives.

[balantz]

3. Is the interesting phone call with the nervous reporter for real?

Sure sounds like the same voice:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3B1dRN2xvg

[jberryhill]

4. Yes that's her

...people have been calling her, stalking her, and harassing her for months to accuse her of being complicit in mass murder.

[Perry Logan]

5. Conspiracy theorists honest-to-God believe that the bad guys leave lots of obvious clues.

It seems to be a central belief of conspiracy people that the bad guys always leave lots of clues--sometimes deliberately.

They leave terrifically obvious clues, but only the conspiracy guys are clever enough to see these clues. (And of course, they don't agree with one another about what these clues are--but never mind.)

The clues rarely seem convincing to non-conspiracy types. The conspiracists respond by calling the nonbelievers stupid.

The BBC pre-announcement of WTC7's collapse is a fine example of a clue, left by the bumbling perps, which gives away the whole plan to those who can see.

More outlandishly, many conspiracy people maintain the starkly counterintuitive belief that the bad guys DELIBERATELY leave clues.

The PNAC document is a good example of this uniquely conspiratorial belief. The evildoers wrote down everything they were going to do and put it on the web--but only the conspiracy people were sharp enough to see it.

Radio host Alex Jones--who always takes everything farther than the other conspiracy guys--says the New World Order has websites where they tell you everything they're going to do. That's right--Alex goes to the secret websites where the New World Order tells you everything it's going to do.

That's how he predicts the future--you see?

I once came across a conspiracy website which predicted a bird flu epidemic. (It was a site called "Oil Empire" or something like that.) The guy knew the bad guys were going to start a bird flu epidemic, because they left clues in "Foreign Relations"--the journal of the Council on Foreign Relations.

The guy honest-to-God believed the CFR deliberately left clues to what they were up to in Foreign Relations--but, in all the world, he was the only one to see it!

Isn't that amazing?

This is a pattern we see over and over again in conspiratorial circles: the perps leave clues--often deliberately--but only the conspiracy folks are clever enough to see them.

Of course, this would be more convincing if the conspiracy people could agree on what the clues are, or why the bad guys would plant them, and why only the conspiracy guys can decipher these clues, etc.

http://www.911myths.com/
http://www.debunking911.com/
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/home