Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Happened to Flight 93

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
demodewd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-04 11:05 PM
Original message
What Happened to Flight 93
What Happened to Flight 93
by Richard Wallace
Mirror, 12 September 2002
www.globalresearch.ca 25 March 2004
The URL of this article is: http://globalresearch.ca/articles/WAL403A.html


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE unmarked military-style jet swooped down at high speed through the valley, twice circled the smoldering black scar where Flight 93 had careered into the ground just seconds earlier and then hurtled off over the horizon.

At least six eyewitnesses saw the mysterious aircraft on the morning of September 11 last year. But the US authorities deny it ever existed.

So when George Bush laid a wreath yesterday at the crash site in a remote valley outside Shanksville, Pennsylvania, he was one of only a handful of people who know what really happened to the 40 innocents and four hijackers aboard the doomed United Airlines Boeing 757-200.

Those unimaginable final seconds as passengers showed courageous defiance apparently wrestling for control of the aircraft have become one of the defining images of the tragedy.

And "Let's roll" - ringleader Todd Beamer's no-nonsense call to arms - became a defining battle cry in America's war on terror.

But of the four aircraft taken on September 11, the exact fate of Flight 93 after its two-hour journey is proving difficult for US officials to explain.

What was the white jet doing there and why won't they admit to its presence? Why did other witnesses see smoke and flames trailing from Flight 93 as it fell from the sky, indicating a possible explosion aboard?

Or - and this is proving to be the most uncomfortable question of all - in the moments before the airliner piled into the black, spongy earth at 575mph did an American fighter pilot have to do the unthinkable and shoot down a US civil airliner?

Susan Mcelwain, 51, who lives two miles from the site, knows what she saw - the white plane rocketed directly over her head.

"It came right over me, I reckon just 40 or 50ft above my mini-van," she recalled. "It was so low I ducked instinctively. It was traveling real fast, but hardly made any sound."Then it disappeared behind some trees. A few seconds later I heard this great explosion and saw this fireball rise up over the trees, so I figured the jet had crashed. The ground really shook. So I dialed 911 and told them what happened.

"I'd heard nothing about the other attacks and it was only when I got home and saw the TV that I realized it wasn't the white jet, but Flight 93.

Didn't think much more about it until the authorities started to say there had been no other plane. The plane I saw was heading right to the point where Flight 93 crashed and must have been there at the very moment it came down.

"There's no way I imagined this plane - it was so low it was virtually on top of me. It was white with no markings but it was definitely military, it just had that look.

"It had two rear engines, a big fin on the back like a spoiler on the back of a car and with two upright fins at the side. I haven't found one like it on the internet. It definitely wasn't one of those executive jets. The FBI came and talked to me and said there was no plane around.

"Then they changed their story and tried to say it was a plane taking pictures of the crash 3,000ft up.

"But I saw it and it was there before the crash and it was 40ft above my head. They did not want my story - nobody here did."

Mrs. Mcelwain, who looks after special needs children, is further convinced the whole truth has yet to come out because of a phone call she had within hours from the wife of an air force friend of the family.

"She said her husband had called her that morning and said 'I can't talk, but we've just shot a plane down,' " Susan said. "I presumed they meant Flight 93. I have no doubt those brave people on board tried to do something, but I don't believe what happened on the plane brought it down.

"If they shot it down, or something else happened, everyone, especially the victims' families, have a right to know."

Lee Purbaugh, 32, was the only person to see the last seconds of Flight 93 as it came down on former strip-mining land at precisely 10.06am - and he also saw the white jet.

He was working at the Rollock Inc. scrap yard on a ridge overlooking the point of impact, less than half a mile away. "I heard this real loud noise coming over my head," he told the Daily Mirror. "I looked up and it was Flight 93, barely 50ft above me. It was coming down in a 45 degree and rocking from side to side. Then the nose suddenly dipped and it just crashed into the ground. There was this big fireball and then a huge cloud of smoke."

But did he see another plane? "Yes, there was another plane," Lee said. "I didn't get a good look but it was white and it circled the area about twice and then it flew off over the horizon."

Tom Spinelli, 28, was working at India Lake Marina, a mile and a half away. "I saw the white plane," he said.

"It was flying around all over the place like it was looking for something. I saw it before and after the crash."

India Lake also contributes to the view there was an explosion on board before the Newark-San Francisco flight came down. Debris rained down on the lake - a curious feat if, as the US government insists, there was no mid-air explosion and the plane was intact until it hit the ground.

"It was mainly mail, bits of in-flight magazine and scraps of seat cloth," Tom said. "The authorities say it was blown here by the wind." But there was only a 10mph breeze and you were a mile and a half away? Tom raised his eyebrows, rolled his eyes and said: "Yeah, that's what they reckon."

Light debris was also found eight miles away in New Baltimore. A section of engine weighing a ton was located 2,000 yards - over a mile -from the crash site. Theorists point out a Sidewinder heat-seeking missile attacks the hottest part of aircraft - the engine.

The authorities say the impact bounced it there. But the few pieces of surviving fuselage, local coroner Wallace Miller told us, were "no bigger than a carrier bag".

Nearly all the passengers were reduced to charcoal on impact and the largest piece of human tissue found was a section of spine eight inches long.

CURIOUSLY, military officials insist there was never any pursuit of Flight 93, although they were informed that it was a suspected hijack at 9.16am, 50 minutes before the plane came down.

At 9.35am they assumed it was heading for Washington DC after it changed course in a 180 degree turn and three F-16s - top speed 1,800mph - now patrolling over the capital were told to "protect the White House at all costs".

An anonymous flight controller said on the day that an F-16 was "in hot pursuit" of Flight 93 - Washington to Shanksville is seven to 10 minutes flying time.

A few minutes before the crash Bill Wright, piloting a single-engine Piper, could see Flight 93 three miles away, but was suddenly told to turn away and land immediately without explanation.

At 9.58am a 911 call - the last mobile phone contact from Flight 93 - was made from one of the airliner's toilets by passenger Edward Felt.

Glenn Cramer, the emergency supervisor who answered it, said on the day: "He was very distraught. He said he believed the plane was going down.

"He did hear some sort of an explosion and saw white smoke coming from the plane, but he didn't know where. And then we lost contact with him." Glenn Cramer has now been gagged by the FBI.

Also, according to sources, the last seconds of the cockpit voice recorder are the loud sounds of wind, hinting at a possible hole somewhere in the fuselage. What caused the smoke and explosion? Why the wind sounds?

The FBI's later explanation for the white jet was that a passing civilian Fairchild Falcon 20 jet was asked to descend from 34,000ft to 5,000ft some minutes after the crash to give co-ordinates for the site. The plane and pilot have never been produced or identified. Susan Mcelwain says a Falcon 20 was not the plane she saw.

FURTHER verification that some kind of military aircraft was operating in the area is scientifically irrefutable.

At 9.22am a sonic boom - caused by supersonic flight - was picked up by an earthquake monitoring station in southern Pennsylvania, 60 miles from Shanksville.

That Todd Beamer and others launched an assault on the hijackers there is no doubt. The brief extracts released from audio tapes indicate a fierce struggle going on at the cockpit door.

But nobody - official or otherwise - has categorically said the group got into the cockpit or that their actions led to the crash. Those final, agonizing moments are mere presumption.

President Bush and his team have the whole story. So why aren't they telling the rest of us?

UA93: THE EVIDENCE
THE WITNESSES
At least SIX witnesses, including Susan Mcelwain saw a small military type plane flying around shortly BEFORE UA93 crashed. The FBI denies its existence

THE DEBRIS
The US Government insists the plane exploded on impact yet a one-ton section of the engine was found over a mile away and other light debris was found scattered over eight miles away

THE MOBILE CALL
Passenger Edward Felt made an emergency call from the plane. He spoke of an explosion and seeing some white smoke. The supervisor who took the call has been gagged by the FBI

THE F-16s
UA93 was identified as a hijack at 9.16am. At 9.35am three F-16s were ordered to "protect the White House at all costs" when it turned towards the capital. At 10.06am it crashed at Shanksville, less than 10mins flying time from Washington

THE BLACK BOXES
Sources claim the last thing heard on the cockpit voice recorder is the sound of wind - suggesting the plane had been holed

THE SONIC BOOM
The FBI insists there was no military plane in the area but at 9.22am a sonic boom - caused by a supersonic jet - was picked up by an earthquake monitor in southern Pennsylvania, 60 miles away from Shanksville.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email this article to a friend

To express your opinion on this article, join the discussion at Global Research's News and Discussion Forum , at http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/index.php

The Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at www.globalresearch.ca grants permission to cross-post original Global Research (Canada) articles in their entirety, or any portions thereof, on community internet sites, as long as the text & title of the article are not modified. The source must be acknowledged as follows: Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at www.globalresearch.ca . For cross-postings, kindly use the active URL hyperlink address of the original CRG article. The author's copyright note must be displayed. (For articles from other news sources, check with the original copyright holder, where applicable.). For publication of Global Research (Canada) articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected] .

© Copyright R WALLACE 2004. For fair use only/ pour usage équitable seulement.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fact-checking is a thing of the past for Mr. Wallace
apparently.

His Mirror piece came out -- what was it? -- several months at least after I retracted the sonic boom thing.

Neither a phone call, nor an email, nor apparently did he visit the site where the front page retracted the sonic boom.

I can't speak to all of his work, but the "irrefutable evidence" is pretty annoying to read when it's been well refuted long before he wrote the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PerpetualYnquisitive Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Flight 93's fate was played on the Simpson's in 1995...
An episode of The Simpson's called Sideshow Bob's Last Gleaming, first aired in 1995, has several parallels to the story of Flight 93:

1) there is a hijacking
2) there is a failed military intercept
3) a pursuer of the plane says the phrase "Let's Roll"
4) the plane crashes in a very remote location

Episode info: http://www.tvtome.com/tvtome/servlet/GuidePageServlet/showid-146/epid-1422/
http://www.twigsdigs.com/stuff/sideshow/arrest.htm

Transcript with Let's Roll: http://www.snpp.com/episodes/3F08.html

This show, like The LoneGunMen pilot episode was broadcast by FOX.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Finally! A theory sillier than the holograms!
:headbang:


Dude, that rocks!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abe Linkman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. In what respect? Why would you say such a thing?
Are you embarassed that the people you are here to defend, are actually stupid enough that they would borrow a line from "The Sinmpsons" to try and give the 9/11 lies more emotion?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. No, I'm embarrassed that some people imply a causal relationship
between The Simpsons and 9/11.

...and since when does patterning an attack after a Simpsons episode give it "more emotion"?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abe Linkman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Where did you get THAT false notion? Make that "THOSE" false...
notions?

Go ahead, now. Be specific. btw - Do you have an assistant? Just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It's my opinion that the poster was implying a relationship between the
episode and the attacks that reached beyond coincidental (especially in light of the sstatement that it was aired on Fox).

No, I don't have an assistant...you looking for a job?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. So Abe
What to you think PerpetualYnquisitive meant in post number 2?

Also please dismount from your new hobby horse that anyone that disagrees with the 9/11 CT'er is a bushco apologist. It's insulting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PerpetualYnquisitive Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. The perps are blatant...
The OFT (Official Fairy Tale) seems to take little pieces from fictional stories and blend them together, they have weaved a tapestry of confusion, constructed a puzzle palace so to speak, to keep all of us from coming to a consensus and ever prosecuting them, for we will never all agree on ALL of the specific details, so they win by default.

The Simpsons parallels may just be a chance coincidence, they also may be something more. I merely pointed out the similarities, though it is telling that the Wolf-pack comes out of the woodwork to ridicule something that probably doesn't mean anything.

Maybe I also shouldn't point out that in the movie Armageddon, Mark Curry playing the role of a NYC Cabbie screams, "We're at war. Saddam Hussein is bombing us." while Manhattan is being pounded by meteorites and actually shows the WTC taking a direct hit and its cratered, smoking ruins after wards.

Saddam = WTC destroyer, nothing like that has ever been perceived now has it? Nothing in common with reality with that now is there?

The Siege, has "Ahmed Bin Talan" (take on bin Laden?) as the main terrorist and he just happens to be from Iraq. The Siege also predicts the round up of "Arab" men after a bombing, to insure that we all knew years ago who to blame for any "terrorist acts".

Maybe Usama bin Oswald just had a really, really good satellite receiver and planned 9/11 using what he had seen on t.v. or maybe it really was Operation Northwoods v2.0!?!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 04:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. As support for my opinion, I offer the following quote:
Edited on Fri Aug-20-04 04:13 AM by MercutioATC
"The Simpsons parallels may just be a chance coincidence, they also may be something more."

That DOES seem to me to be suggesting that there may be more than a cooincidental link between The Simpsons and 9/11.

...and that's all I was saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PerpetualYnquisitive Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I'm not saying there is a definite link...
between The Simpsons and 9/11, I am only pointing out that there are parallels between what has been presented in television, movies and books and what transpired on/after 9/11 and that there could be more to it than seems on the surface.

Such as the book The Minotaur by Stephen Coonts (Flight of the Intruder as well). On page 45 (hardcover) you will find this passage:

"After all, who the hell was Jake Grafton? What could an over-the-hill attack pilot in glasses with four stripes on his sleeve do for a three-star admiral? Bomb the Pentagon?"

Does this mean I think Coonts planned to bomb the Pentagon? No, I am just showing that the architects of 9/11 may have drawn "their plan" partially from media sources, then again it may all just be a strange synchronicity.

Like this:

"I Am The World Trade Center" "Out Of The Loop" Track 11 "September"
Scroll down to see tracks.

Art imitating life imitating art.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I understand.
Abe just jumped down my throat for finding it funny. I never meant to imply that you said there was a definite link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abe Linkman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. But murky: That's what your words definitely implied. Here they are:
"It's my opinion that the poster was implying a relationship between the
episode and the attacks that reached beyond coincidental (especially in light of the sstatement that it was aired on Fox)."

You can run, but you can't hide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yes, and he WAS implying that possibility. Read Post #12
Sheesh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abe Linkman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. And you said he WASN'T! You're flip-flopping, again.
Edited on Fri Aug-20-04 08:11 AM by Abe Linkman
Sheesh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I did no such thing. Are we experiencing a language barrier again?
Edited on Fri Aug-20-04 08:23 AM by MercutioATC
I said he was suggesting the link might have been more than coincidental.

He replied that he didn't mean he felt there was a "definite link".

I responded that I understood that he wasn't claiming a "definite link".

What don't you understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PerpetualYnquisitive Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. If you want to see something really strange...
...rent Armageddon and pause it at 8 minutes and 58 seconds into the DVD (wide screen edition) and you may notice an anomaly just to the left of the WTC. I'll see if I can dig up a screeny to post later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Question
Based on your comments it seems there exists a group of people that believe movies and television shows are some sort of harbinger or precursor of the future?

Is this true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PerpetualYnquisitive Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Though such a group may exist,
I am not affiliated in any way. I am just pointing out some of the strange coincidences where real events seemingly mirror that which has been portrayed in movies, t.v., books etc.

I am not saying that there is a "Smoking Gun" connection, just that it should be taken into consideration that some of these 'ideas' have been around in other forms prior to their (sur)real manifestations.?.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PerpetualYnquisitive Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-04 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. Screeny now available


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abe Linkman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. You have flip-flopped on this so many times I can't keep up with 'em all.
You really seem desperate if you think that trying to parse some kind of meaningful difference between "more than coincidental" and "definite".
You know exactly what he meant.

You're a flip-flopper. (I'm trying to put it in a way so that if you run to momma, it won't work.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Gee Abe
I think there is some meaningful difference between "more than coincidental" and "definite."

To me at least it seems rather desperate making an attempt to equate the two.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Seems to be meaningful enough to me.

"Definite link" would imply a demonstrable connection, one action aware of another before it.

"more than coincidental" need imply no more than that two actions were subject to similar influences.

In a criminal conspiracy trial the difference would make a good deal of difference.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. I'm sorry if you can't see the difference.
Everything's not black and white, you know....or do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DulceDecorum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-04 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. And speaking of seeing...
MercutioATC,
you claim to be an Air Traffic Controller.

Very good then.
Here is an air traffic control question.
Why would you tell a pilot to make a circular approach?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-04 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Busy flight paths are well defined

We live beneath one. On their way to America the jumbos fly over as if on rails. Five miles from Heathrow the variation of their pre defined trajectories is no more than a few hundred yards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DulceDecorum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. That must be the first time
RH ever responded to one of my posts
WITHOUT
being downright nasty.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-04 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Well, I wouldn't. There's no such thing as a "circular approach".
Could you be more specific?

If you're referring to a "circle to land" approach, I DO have an answer. A "circle to land" is used when the pilot wishes to execute an approach to a runway other than the active runway. The pilot will fly the approach to, say, Runway 21 and "circle to land" on Runway 5 (RWY 5 being the active runway).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DulceDecorum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. I thought it had something to do with
overshooting the runway
and crashing into the fence at the end.

What would make a pilot do that - accidentally?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Self-deleted (replied to wrong post) n/t
Edited on Sun Aug-22-04 10:19 PM by AZCat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. If you're like me...
Then it's because you're a bad pilot. I used to work at a place that ran big flight simulators and I'd overshoot the runway all the time. Otherwise, it could be a lot of things. Ice on the runway, a thrust reverser malfunction, bounce (a real problem on hot days), failing to get the AC down fast enough.

If a pilot sees that he's going to overshoot the runway, they're supposed to abort and go around for another try, but there's a point when you can't abort (not enough room based on your current speed). MercutioATC can probably tell you more about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Overshooting the runway? As AZcat said, there are many reasons
that could happen. Hopefully, when one of these conditions exists, there's enough runway (and speed) left to execute a missed approach and go around. Sometimes, there isn't.

If I knew what you were getting at, I might be able to explain things better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PerpetualYnquisitive Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
35. It's not as if I was the first to think of this...
I merely applied it to show similarities between a fictional story and a real life event.


Plot Summary for
Three Days of the Condor (1975)

A man named Turner works for the CIA reading books and postulating possible scenarios that could be applied to intelligence work. He goes out to get lunch but when he returns everyone at the center has been killed. He calls his superior and asks for someone to bring him in, he tells him that his section chief will get him but when he arrives, the man tries to shoot him, he manages to shoot back and escape. In an act of desperation, the abducts a woman and forces her to shelter him until he can figure out what is going on. When someone goes to the woman's house and tries to kill him, he kills the man and discovers that he has a connection to the CIA, which means that someone in the CIA is behind the attempt on him.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0073802/plotsummary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC