Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New William Pepper (MLK) Interview - COINTELPRO/Infiltration

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:11 PM
Original message
New William Pepper (MLK) Interview - COINTELPRO/Infiltration
http://www.911blogger.com/node/6332

"This week, Visibility 9-11 visits the topic of COINTELPRO in the 3rd part of a new series on issues facing the 9-11 Truth Movement. "Left gatekeepers", dis-information specialists, agent provocateurs, and internet "trolls" all work to distract and/or discredit the fine work of literally thousands of good and caring Americans involved in 9-11 Truth. It is important to recognize the history of things our government has done which has violated every tenet of a free society.

This broadcast features an interview with author and researcher Dr. William F. Pepper. Dr. Pepper gave a key note speech at the June 2006 conference, 9-11 Revealing the Truth; Reclaiming Our Future, where he warned the crowd of activists of the existence of COINTELPRO forces which would seek to destroy all of their hard work. During his work with Martin Luther King before his murder, Dr. Pepper saw first hand what agents of the state could do to a social movement.

Counter Intelligence Programs, or COINTELPRO, are one more example of the federal governments' raping of our rights. These abuses were going on during the 50's, 60's and 70's, and though they were prohibited by the Church Committee regulations, they have not ceased. They are alive and well within political groups which would seek to bring about truth, justice and accountability to our government. 9-11 Truth is no exception and activists need to educate themselves on the "dirty little tricks" our government uses against our rights to free speech and association. Only then, can we learn to recognize, and then address the attempts which would tear down all of our hard work.

This is one of the most important programs I have ever produced. I hope that you will all take it to heart and encourage others to hear this interview and the entire special report on COINTELPRO.

This episode can be downloaded by clicking here."

(43.6 MB MP3)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. George Washington
"A passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one nation the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions; by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens who devote themselves to the favorite nation, facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good, the foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation."

- George Washington
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Streaming audio version
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CB_Brooklyn Donating Member (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. 911Blogger.com Practices Censorship
There are many "Left gatekeepers", dis-information specialists, agent provocateurs, and internet "trolls" who attempt to "distract and/or discredit" from what really happened.

These people can be identified in the following ways:

1. Refusal to address science and laws of physics.

2. Use of words such as "crazy" or "disinfo" to discourage people from looking at evidence.

3. Censoring information, such as DEW and non-refutable TV-Fakery. (911Blogger does this. Any site that systematically censors scientific research cannot be trusted.)


What's important is for the truth of 9/11 to be exposed. Those who know the real truth are not going to hold back just to spare the feelings of those who have been brainwashed into thinking DEW/TV-Fakery cannot be true. If they want continued respect, they need to start exposing the two truths - DEW and TV-Fakery - that the 9/11 perps want kept secret. Exposing anything else is either of lesser importance, or in some cases, damaging.

Sites that censor are bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vincent_vega_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. 1. Refusal to address science and laws of physics.
Holy Crap thats rich. :rofl:

But then I think of the state of education in this country which produced some of the theories tossed about as "addressing science and the laws of physics." :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. What's DEW and TV-Fakery?
I haven't noticed those mentioned (at least on DU) before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bushwick Bill Donating Member (605 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. See
the google video I just posted for the wonderful job Judy Wood does of explaining the use of directed energy weapons from outer space.

TV fakery is the idea that no planes were used and what we saw on TV were computer generated injects and that something else like missiles hit the buildings.

I detest the DEW/Fakery disinfo more than anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CB_Brooklyn Donating Member (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. laws of physics and evidence
The CGI at the south tower is already proven. Only those who don't understand it don't believe it. The "crash physics" is based on laws of physics and has not (and cannot) been refuted.

DEWs is based on the available scientific evidence.

Judy Wood has NEVER said that the beam must have come from outer space. That rumor was started by none other than Steven Jones:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/90


The video that you link to was an "ambush interview" by Greg Jenkins to attempt to discredit Judy Wood. Judy hadn't slept for 48 hours and drove 600 miles to the National Press Club to be in the audience. She was not expecting to be interviewed.

Both Steven Jones and Greg Jenkins have ties to Los Alamos Laboratories, where directed-energy weapon (DEW) research is conducted.

Jenkins' previous work was funded by the NSA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bushwick Bill Donating Member (605 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim Howells Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks Reprehensor
It is really encouraging to see that there are so many good
people out there who are not taken in by the crap and who
will not go down without a fight.

Notice that they simply do not do polls on September 11.
There was one single poll commissioned and paid for
by 911Truth.org, and then one more with a different
format by Scripps Howard. Both showed surprising and
increasing numbers of people who think that it is
likely that there was US Government involvement in 911.
By the time of the Scripps Howard poll the it was up
to 36%. I would bet that it is over 50% now, but don't
hold your breath waiting for the next poll.

Tim Howells
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. The PNAC crew are cold-war dinosaurs.
They had the MSM all sewn up but they didn't take the rise of the internet into account.

Seems like they're learning fast though - on some blogs and talkbacks I've read recently it almost seems like the disruptors have tag-teams.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC