New Site....

[wildbilln864]

I just came across. Check it out. Here.

[William Seger]

1. Nothing there to "check out" yet

They've been promising this "groundbreaking evidence" for months now, but they seem to be having some problems getting it to market (one of which seems to be that Lyte Trip is starting to worry about lawsuits, and another of which is that even Avery & Co. aren't going to support them).

> The main purpose of this study was to establish the flight path in the final moments before reaching the Pentagon as seen by the eyewitnesses.

Uh, no, the main purpose of the study was to attempt to discredit "the flight path in the final moments before reaching the Pentagon as seen by the {dozens of} eyewitnesses" who reported what they saw immediately after it happened, with some sky pointing by a three witnesses who are recalling something they saw for about two seconds five years ago. These three witnesses will be what this group will claim "demonstrates beyond reasonable doubt" that all the other witnesses are either lying or mistaken about a plane that flew right over their heads, and even more incredibly, that all the physical evidence must have been faked. But on the other hand, Trip seems to know his target audience fairly well: One thing you won't see in the video is any of his incredibly credible witnesses -- or anyone else -- saying they saw the plane fly over the Pentagon, as they will nonetheless claim must have happened.

[Contrite]

2. wildbill, have you seen this site?

http://911research.wtc7.net/papers/trumpman/CoreAnalysisFinal.htm

This author's paper is quite thorough. It was posted at the PhysOrgForum and people there seemed to have a very hard time trying to critique it.

[wildbilln864]

3. no I hadn't yet but...

thanks for the heads up Contrite. :hi:

[jschurchin]

4. A very good paper............

Indeed!!!
Thank You for the link Contrite.

[Contrite]

5. You're welcome, guys--

It appears it hasn't received adequate attention, somehow.