Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Debate the 9/11 Skeptics - March 10, 2007

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 07:29 AM
Original message
Debate the 9/11 Skeptics - March 10, 2007

The National 9/11 Debate seeks people willing to defend government account of 9/11 in a public debate forum: March 10, 2007

As of August 1, 2006, the 9/11 Commissioners, NIST scientists, and other key personnel responsible for the governments non-sustainable account of what happened in the United States on September 11, 2001 all refuse to participate in the National 9/11 Debate that was originally scheduled for September 16, 2006 in Charleston, SC. Consequently, the National 9/11 Debate date has been moved forward to March 10, 2007.

While the 9/11 Commissioners and NIST scientists remain invited to participate in the National 9/11 Debate, the Muckraker Report has expanded the potential government debate team members to any qualified persons that are willing to publicly defend the governments account of 9/11 against the civilian debate team already assembled.

The elapsed collapse time of WTC 1, 2, and 7 debunks the governments pancake theory of collapse. Coupled with the fact that chemical traces of substances normally associated with controlled demolition have been found on debris from ground zero, and the fact that the government never developed a working controlled demolition hypothesis when investigating how WTC 1, 2, and 7 collapsed even though the collapse of each clearly looked like controlled demolitions, is sufficient cause to hold a public National 9/11 Debate. Basically, all one needs is a stopwatch to understand that the government has yet to provide a sustainable theory as to how the twin towers and building seven collapsed, explains Ed Haas, National 9/11 Debate Coordinator. A $2 stopwatch provides hard evidence that the government has failed to adequately explain what happened in NYC on 9/11. Why those desperate to believe the governments account of 9/11 continue to ignore this basic fact must be answered.

If youre an outspoken critic of people that disagree with the official government theory of 9/11, heres a golden opportunity for you to attempt to silence the critics. If you think you have the right stuff, contact Ed Haas today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC