Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Truth at Last, While Breaking a US Taboo of Criticizing Israel

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 03:15 PM
Original message
Truth at Last, While Breaking a US Taboo of Criticizing Israel
by George Bisharat

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0102-60.htm

<snip>

Americans owe a debt to former President Jimmy Carter for speaking long hidden but vital truths. His book Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid breaks the taboo barring criticism in the United States of Israel's discriminatory treatment of Palestinians. Our government's tacit acceptance of Israel's unfair policies causes global hostility against us.

Israel's friends have attacked Carter, a Nobel laureate who has worked tirelessly for Middle East peace, even raising the specter of anti-Semitism. Genuine anti-Semitism is abhorrent. But exploiting the term to quash legitimate criticism of another system of racial oppression, and to tarnish a principled man, is indefensible. Criticizing Israeli government policies - a staple in Israeli newspapers - is no more anti-Semitic than criticizing the Bush administration is anti-American.

The word apartheid typically evokes images of former South Africa, but it also refers to any institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over another. Carter applies the term only to Israel's rule of the occupied Palestinian territories, where it has established more than 200 Jewish-only settlements and a network of roads and other services to support them. These settlements violate international law and the rights of Palestinian property owners. Carter maintains that "greed for land," not racism, fuels Israel's settlement drive. He is only partially right.

Israel is seizing land and water from Palestinians for Jews. Resources are being transferred, under the guns of Israel's military occupation, from one disempowered group - Palestinian Christians and Muslims - to another, preferred group - Jews. That is racism, pure and simple...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
breakaleg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. This interests me.
"Israel's Basic Law of Human Dignity and Liberty establishes the state as a "Jewish democracy" although 24 percent of the population is non-Jewish. Adalah, the Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel, counted 20 laws that explicitly privilege Jews over non-Jews.

The government favors Jews over Palestinians in the allocation of resources. Palestinian children in Israel attend "separate and unequal" schools that receive a fraction of the funding awarded to Jewish schools, according to Human Rights Watch. Many Palestinian villages, some predating the establishment of Israel, are unrecognized by the government, do not appear on maps, and thus receive no running water, electricity, or access roads. Since 1948, scores of new communities have been founded for Jews, but none for Palestinians, causing them severe residential overcrowding."

Here is something concrete that can either be proven or dis-proven. I would like to know how a supporter of Israel views this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UndertheOcean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It seems no one has te guts to respond ...
typical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shaktimaan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. Sounds interesting.
Can you link to those 20 examples? I'd like to see them.

Most of Israel suffers more from de-facto segregation than outright institutionalized racism. Arabs are not required to attend segregated schools nor are they restricted in where they are allowed to live. There are laws where Arabs are treated differently, such as the requirement that all serve in the IDF being waived for them. But they are allowed to serve if they wish. It seems unwise to require them to serve considering that they might be asked to fight their own families if a war between Israel and, say, Syria broke out.

That isn't to say there isn't racism. There is. And Arab Israelis are doubtlessly treated as second class citizens. But I do honestly believe that this will change as the Israel/Palestinian situation eases. Remember when America was fighting Japan a few decades ago and how we treated ethnic Japanese who were American citizens? Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow, I'm delirious - less than five minutes ago - I read a truth article
about Brokaw (on/through DU) and now a truth article on Carter. (My slant on truth). THis has been a good hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. A wonderful person, George Bisharat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. It is amusing to me
that someone who has such a visible bias is esteemed by the very posters who often scream for "balance" from pro Israeli sources.

A Palestinian American professor who writes for Counterpunch and Common Dreams, has his articles linked at every whackjob Jewish conspiracy site on the Internets, and states lies like “Palestinians living in Israel cannot serve in the armed forces”, is not someone who I would hold in high regard or deem as a truth seeker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idontwantaname Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. ah, but he is not screaming "Palestinians living in Israel cannot serve in the armed forces" today
so what do you think of this article?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. His analysis is much better than yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Please feel free to post/reference the specific...
...instances of any and all who have posted on this thread where they've screamed for balance from pro Israeli sources.

Taking cheap shots at the source rather than responsibly challenging the content of an editorial is usually indicative someone ill-equipped or simply too intellectually lazy to develop an argument.

Disappointing? Yes. Surprising? No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Do you REALLY think that "cheap shots"
are not taken all the time about pro Israel sources? Seriously?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idontwantaname Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. i think he would like references
and im curious what you thought of the article as it says nothing about palestinians in the IDF...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Violet_Crumble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. I'd like to see some references as well n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I haven't seen any on this thread...
...and, in any case, why would you choose to emulate such behavior?

If a car traveling in front of the car you're driving runs the red light, do you go ahead and run it too?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
15. kick for "truthiness."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC