Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Police covering for gun crimes.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
Remmah2 Donating Member (971 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:32 AM
Original message
Police covering for gun crimes.
I guess the BATF is not an exclusive fraternity.


http://articles.philly.com/2011-08-01/news/29838863_1_fiu-vincent-testa-weapons

Officer Anthony Magsam was in a world of trouble. It was August 2009, police sources said, and the young cop with high-ranking relatives in the Police Department had just tearfully confessed to stealing parts from two automatic weapons from the department's Firearms Identification Unit.

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Of course in Philadelphia, police cover for all kinds of crimes, not just gun crimes. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is Philly PD using "automatic weapons?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Some departments still have some MP5's and whatnot in the SWAT inventory...
Edited on Wed Aug-03-11 01:48 PM by benEzra
and I know of a few who use military-surplus M16's for SWAT instead of civilian AR-15's.

I do know our local SWAT team uses civilian rifles (Rock River, actually) but I have no idea what Philly PD uses. I googled "Philadelphia SWAT" and found mostly indeterminate low-res pics, although a couple of pics were pretty clearly civilian-length barrels, and they are running optics on flattop uppers so they're probably not milsurp.

The officer in question is accused of violating the National Firearms Act prohibition on private possession of unregistered machineguns or machinegun parts outside of government service, so it appears that at least those two guns (whatever they were) were Title 2 restricted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
era veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Their Air Force has used bombs before.
Looks like a dirty PD again or still.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC