Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NRA Supports Chicagoans Challenge of New Ant-Gun Rights Law (New lawsuit in the works)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
shadowrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 02:53 PM
Original message
NRA Supports Chicagoans Challenge of New Ant-Gun Rights Law (New lawsuit in the works)

Corporation Counsel Mara Georges, the top attorney for the city, said, We’ve gone farther than anyone else ever has
National Rifle Association

National Rifle Association

Chicago, IL –(Ammoland.com)- Barely a week after the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in McDonald v. City of Chicago, NRA is supporting a new lawsuit — Benson v. City of Chicago — to enforce the court’s decision. The suit, filed on July 6 against the city and its mayor, Richard Daley, is the first to challenge the city’s new gun control ordinance passed on July 2 (please see related story from last week’s Grassroots Alert here).

Just four days after the Court struck down the nearly 30 year-long handgun bans in the cities of Chicago and Oak Park, Chicago enacted one of the most restrictive anti-gun ordinances in the United States. Commenting on the scope of the new ordinance, Corporation Counsel Mara Georges, the top attorney for the city, said, “We’ve gone farther than anyone else ever has.”

http://www.ammoland.com/2010/07/11/nra-supports-chicagoans-challenge-of-new-ant-gun-rights-law/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Mayor Daley may be the most anti-choice politician in America today
Against a woman's right to choose and against the right to choose to own a handgun.

See, pro-choice to me means more than just abortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Daley is a Thug and a Bear Fan
P.S.-- The Bears still SUCK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yay Republican supporting NRA! Yay Right-Wing Ammoland!
So glad that our DU donations go towards the not so indirect defeat of Democrats.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I've asked you several times to show me a left-wing website that's PRO-RKBA
You remain strangely silent. Wonder why that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneshooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. It's just that he/she/it is soooo busy that there just isn't any time left! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. The NRA supports Democrats too, if they are pro-RKBA.
And the NRA opposes those Republicans that are anti-RKBA.

You already know that, but you choose to ignore it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. "...our DU donations go toward the... defeat of Democrats." Really?
Please explain. Both the Moderators and DU membership may be interested to know about this front group Democratic Underground, which (by your account) supports the defeat of Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
31. Ammo may be the key
Edited on Sun Jul-11-10 07:50 PM by HockeyMom
After all, if you cannot get ammo, what will be the point of owning 100 guns? I know my husband has one gun he cannot get any ammo for, so he cannot shoot it, and is looking to sell it.

Interesting. Does the constitutional right apply to ammo too? Place restrictions on the buying and selling of ammo instead, or supplies to MAKE ammo. Yes, I though of that one too. Husband used to make his own ammo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Like banning ink, because you cant ban books.
you husband should buy a reloading press. Reload 1000 rounds in an hour..

dillon makes nice stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #34
43. Did that years ago
when we had a basement and room to do it. He sold all that equipment when we moved out of state. Besides, I don't think he is into that anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Yes the 2A applies to ammo too. You'll note that it is a right to "arms" not just firearms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. defacto ban on right to keep and bear arms..
One can't bear arms without ammo (just ask the Continental Army ammo was often in short supply).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does the NRA support ANY restrctions on guns?
Tell me what restrictions AT ALL they support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Google is your friend. I won't do your research for you
Read it for yourself, that way, you can't say I'm misrepresenting their position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. I'm lazy
I could just get out my husband's NRA mags I suppose. I get the feeling they don't like registrations, licensing, permit, etc., and charging FEES for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cowman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. All registration does
is let the govt. have a list of gun owners, now I don't know about you, but I would distrust the Feds with that info, and why should I, as a law abiding American citizen ask permission to own a gun when the BoR says it is my RKBA and how much would you charge for your right, hell, while we're at it, lets charge fees to vote, lets have a fee for the right to speak freely or to worship to whatever god we want to. Don't go down that slippery slope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Let me see
I had to pay a fee to get copy of a birth certificste. I had to pay a fee to get a passport. I had to pay money to get my kids vaccinations before they could start FREE public schools.

Actually, even to VOTE I had to pay rent/mortgage, pay electric bills, or something, to prove I lived where I did to vote.

Nothing is FREE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cowman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Lets see
not one of those are in the Bill of Rights. Thats the difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Callisto32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
40. Public schools are not free.
They are paid for, by the taxes you and many others pay, costs go WAY beyond those vaccinations.

Anyway. Why not look at this the other way, and instead of using the terrible fees and restrictions as an excuse to restrict more. Condemn the restrictions already in place as well.

You probably won't respond, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Have you read the other replies? Lots of answerers to your question there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Registrations. licensing, permit schemes have shown to be big money
wasters and no more affective in finding criminals that the forward trace system that has been in affect for decades now. As far as charging fees for the right to own a firearm I am as apposed to that as charging fees to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Indirectly,
Edited on Sun Jul-11-10 04:23 PM by HockeyMom
you still have to pay to prove to vote. I remember they gave me a hard time when I was 18, not having a drivers license, and still living at home with prents, a very hard time when it came to voting. So, if you aren't "paying" somehow it is difficult to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cowman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. jeeeez
where the hell do you live? In Nv. all I had to do was go register to vote, I didn't have to show anything except my DL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. As I understand Texas, indigents can receive an I.D. card free of charge.
Other states I'm sure will vary.

Have you read the other replies to your question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Varies by state.
Here in WA, it's like that. Other states, some are more restrictive, some less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
38. Indirectly is the key word.
The govt has no obligation to make rights free they simply have a restriction to add additional burden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
39. Maybe because it's a Civil Right...
Would you be O.K. with any of those things applied to your right to have books and papers?

How about you show me your Thirteenth Amendment licence and proof of training?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Do the research yourself, or peruse these threads, but here are 2:
(1) The National Instant Background Check System (NICS) which was enacted under Clinton;
(2) The 1934 Gun Control Act (which put FULL AUTO weapons under strict regulation, in place to this day).

When you see the measures supported by the NRA, please report back to this thread and acknowledge such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. NRA supports the NICS instant background checks.
The support the law that makes it illegal for several classes of people to not have guns. Those classes include felons, violent domestic abusers, judged mentally incompetent.

The NRA supports the 1934 Gun Control Act.

Now you have been told. Please don't again claim that the NRA opposes all gun restrictions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneshooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
8.  What restrictions do you support? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glassunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Yes.
H.R. 2640 they supported, it was a massive expansion of the NICS background checks. It was submitted by a Dem and backed by the NRA.

NICS itself was backed by the NRA.

The gun control act of 1968 http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_Control_Act

FAOPA http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearm_Owners_Protection_Act, it contained quite a bit of gun control amendments

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Rifle_Association, just look under criticism. There are many "gun control" measures that the NRA has supported. Many don't want to believe it, that they don't want every 10 year old with an extra $5 running around with an Uzi.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
27. They supported the 1934 NFA, the 1986 GOPA
and a few others that resulted in the severe restriction, and eventual banning of new fully automatic and select-fire firearms.

For starters.

They also put more weight behind the 'brady instant check system' than the brady coalition did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pullo Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
44. They support restrictions on the goverment from infringing our civil liberties
The Second Amendment, specifically
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
23. Looks like I may want to join the NRA -30 or more years after I quit...
Daley is wrong and and should be taken down, and along with him the remainder of the illegal "gun control" laws in the US

I believe the NRA will get some of my money very soon.


mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Keep in mind that it was NOT the NRA that brought about Heller or McDonald.
Edited on Sun Jul-11-10 04:39 PM by Hoopla Phil
In fact the NRA did everything they could to derail the Parker case (it became the Heller case later when parker lost standing). The NRA has done a masterful job of taking credit but they do not deserve it. The Credit goes to Second Amendment Foundation: http://www.saf.org/

Please consider giving to them.

On Edit: It was the NRA's action in Parker that made me send in my membership card. I will never give another cent to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Yeah, they eschew court cases (in favor of legislating), but soon as a winner...
appears in the courts, they stomp pass their marks and head for the limelight. They did that with both Heller and McDonald.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #24
41. I returned mine in the early 80's when they went right wing...I am hoping
enough liberal members can influence the course of the NRA and make it into a good organization as it once was.


mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. Join the NRA but don't contribute to the NRA-ILA ...
very little of your membership dues to the NRA go to support NRA-ILA political activities.


The fund-raising that sustains NRA`s legislative activities is conducted by ILA. Federal and many state election laws dictate that funds used to assist candidates for office must be raised separately, and that is the task of NRA`s political action committee--the NRA Political Victory Fund (NRA-PVF). Neither NRA member dues nor contributions to ILA can be used directly for the election or defeat of candidates.

Because of these clearly defined parameters, and because only a small fraction of ILA`s operating budget comes from regular NRA membership dues, both ILA and NRA-PVF must continuously raise the funds needed to sustain NRA`s legislative and political activities. The resources expended in these arenas come from the generous contributions of NRA members--above and beyond their regular dues.
http://www.nraila.org/Issues/FactSheets/Read.aspx?id=18...


The NRA still has a lot of good programs that are worthy of support.

http://www.nra.org/programs.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. I agree. I will probably join before the end of the year. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
26. Wow.
I'm stunned.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iktomiwicasa Donating Member (942 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
29. Dipshit Daley...
...is going to get his ass handed to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
30. What's an Ant-Gun? If I have a right to own one, I want one.
I have hundreds of huge black ants coming out of my driveway, so an ant-gun would be ideal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. It is a diabolic weapon available only to the insidious Neo-Typo.
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. How can I get to be one of those Neo-Typos.
Edited on Sun Jul-11-10 08:04 PM by MineralMan
I have a serious ant problem, and I desperately need an Ant-Gun. I mean...I have a deer rifle, a varmint rifle, and a target rifle. I have a duck gun, and a pheasant gun, and even a trap gun, although I can't remember the last time I saw a trap fly by. I'd get an elephant gun, but there aren't a lot of elephants in my area.

But...I have lots of ants, and they're ruining my driveway. An Ant-Gun would be just the thing. Not much recoil, either, I'll bet. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneshooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #33
37.  Just remember they are only available in pairs
One ant gun and one uncle gun!!

Oneshooter
Armed and Livin in Texas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #33
42. Old B.C. cartoon.
One of the characters is on a picnic with the cute girl. Ants are a problem. He see the anteater close by. Final panel shows him holding the anteater like a Tommy-gun and wiping out the ants. The sound is written as Zot-zot-zot-zot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC