Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Hampshire to join states with "Federal exemption" gun law, with big time twist..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
virginia mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 03:18 PM
Original message
New Hampshire to join states with "Federal exemption" gun law, with big time twist..
Pre-filed for the 2010 legislative session in New Hampshire, House Bill 1285 (HB1285) seeks to exempt firearms, firearm accessories, and ammunition manufactured in New Hampshire from federal law and regulation.

Not content, to just join the states, with firearm exception laws, New Hampshire, adds an interesting bit of spice" to their law, that is certain to piss off some in the BATF and gun control movement in ways that can only be imagined.


"Any official, agent, or employee of the government of the United States, ... that enforces or attempts to enforce a act, order, law, statute, rule or regulation of the government of the United States upon a personal firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured commercially or privately in New Hampshire and that remains within the State of New Hampshire shall be guilty of a class B felony.


LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rd_kent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Holy crap!
Not sure that it will have any effect, since the DEA ignores state laws on drugs......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Same-sex marriage and wild west gun laws.
What a combo! New Hampshire is always interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virginia mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Bring back the wild west..
The crime rate was MUCH lower...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. You ought to step next door to Vermont. NO laws governing concealed-carry...
Vermont makes New Hampshire and many Southern states look like former Eastern Bloc countries when it comes to liberal gun laws. Only Alaska rivals Vermont.

Huge crime rate in Vermont. Really. I heard it on the Internet. Blood in the streets, and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. If I ever move, it will be to New Hampshire. Wow. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rd_kent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. The ignorance is strong in this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sturm-Ruger manufactures firearms in NH. I didn't find
any others except one place that makes reroduction antiques.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Sig is in Exeter, NH
they are a massive supplier to the government. They sell high quality weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frebrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. LOL indeed!!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Love it.
I don't know if the law will past court muster or not, but I love the way it shoots the finger to the Fed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Obviously in need of federal preemption. Viva scarcity from sea to shining sea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. You still ignore 2A. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Federal pre-emption will come in the form of incorporation of the 2nd Amendment.
Which will have a very, very different effect than what you are hoping for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rd_kent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. Don't you ever get tired of repeating yourself and showing your ignorance?
Is the self-loathing that bad?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Not going to happen.
Edited on Sat Jan-02-10 06:14 PM by AtheistCrusader
The Supreme Court has ruled that an individual pot plant, grown by an individual, for individual use, inside that individual's own home, is covered by interstate commerce.

This state law will fly like the hindenburg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. It isn't intended to fly. It is a toothless protest law.
Its purpose is to make a statement, not to be a working law. Kind of like Kennesaw, GA requiring every household to have a gun. Unenforcable and not intended to be inforced, but to make a statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. Won't happen
Edited on Sat Jan-02-10 07:35 PM by MichaelHarris
Supreme Court already heard the case, Gonzales v. Raich (previously Ashcroft v. Raich. Replace marijuana with firearms, you should get the point. Why do you hate the 2nd Amendment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
13. boy the facts
killed this POS thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tburnsten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
15. What a wonderful state
Any time the Federal Government gets something shoved right back down their throats, I think is a good thing. Make 'em a little more humble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan 26th 2021, 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC