Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

always an exception for Law Enforcement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:17 AM
Original message
always an exception for Law Enforcement
This is not an anti-law enforcement post- i support our officials but i question why much gun legislation makes exceptions for off-duty law enforcement. such things as safe storage laws - which are passed under the premise that it will prevent guns from being stolen or used by children- but these laws often have exceptiosn for retired and off duty LEO. Is an offduty LEO less likely to have his gun stolen? Is an off duty LEO's child less likely to shoot himself then a regular citizens child? the assault weapons ban in NY allows off-duty and retired LEO to purchase assault weapons- why? I was always taught that once taking off your uniform and your badge, you are a private citizen like everyone else, so why do the laws say differently?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Law enforcement deal with the scum of the earth
Many times they are threatened by these dirtbags, the last thing you want to do is put them in a position of weakness. Beyond that LEO don't become private citizens when they go home. They are still police officers and they still can and many do take actions, when witnessing a crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. that is not true
you may be expected by your department to be on call at all times, but the powers of their office stay in the office when they go home from work. There department may require they carry a gun, but they must have the same permit a private citizen has in order to carry their gun (but police officers)

its the same with FF- my powers that are given to me being a FF ends when i take off my uniform and go home- i have almost no authority unless im acting under the authorization of my department.

even if what you say is true....why is it okay to put citizens in a position of weakness?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. This is not true. My badge gave me the power to carry anywhere in NY any time.
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 08:49 PM by jmg257
It also said I can purchase handguns "instantly" on that shield, and the gun didn't have to be for dept use. (there was paperwork to be filed though).

I also had certain police/peace officer powers off duty that normal citizens don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. with my NYS pistol permit
so can i....as long as i go through the NICS check which LEOs have to go through (i work at a gun store so i have done these checks atleast a dozen times on officers)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Can you carry in NYC? Schools? Besides, what I was saying is that I didn't need the permit - I had
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 05:01 PM by jmg257
the shield. And you have to get a purchase coupon/amendment for your permit to add a pistol.

What I thought you were saying is that I needed a permit as a cop to carry - off duty - I didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. well technically
your ID card acts as a pistol permit- and as a carry permit as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. they also will hopefully have the brain and the training

to not be careless or stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. i'm sorry
i just dont see much sense in that answer....i still don't think that justifies them as private citizens to be exempt from certain laws. when a police officers house is broken into- is his gun less likely to be stolen then if a private citizen's house gets broken into? i doubt it


my own belief on the subject is more of a political belief on it. I believe its all politics- designed to curry favor with law enforcement by basically saying "don't worry, it will never apply to you anytime in your life"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boomer 50 Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I've been a firearms trainer for a long, long time
And nothing against police but they are, in general, far from competent with firearms. To most of them it's just a part of the job, it's not a hobby or passion. Private citizens are usually more competent, more interested in learning and take it more seriously than most police officers. I also find that overall, non-law enforcement citizens seek out more and better training on their own.

On the initial post, exemptions in laws for law enforcement for gun laws are basically unConstitutional and my company does not recognize such exemptions. We do not sell any item to LE that we can't sell to the average everyday law abiding citizen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. kudos
to you and your company my friend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadEyeDyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
27. well said nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Police in general are not terribly well-trained with firearms
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 10:46 PM by dmesg
And, incidentally, they have a somewhat higher crime rate than the population as a whole (mostly because police are predominantly young males and the population as a whole isn't).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbo Teg Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. Just like CCW holders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pappy Donating Member (113 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. The reason is obvious.
I am against all guns including the government having them too. Anytime a government places exceptions for their agents then you can only assume that the real goal is to have more power over their subjects. Its a damn shame that in the end people like me ultimately become nothing more than useful idiots. Bottom line is all law enforcement and military must have to submit to the same laws the rest of us have to otherwise the exact opposite of what these laws were meant to bring about will happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. agreed
i may not be against guns, but the law should apply to everyone equally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. "Exception" mentality comes from the likes of Diane Feinstein...
She had/has a CCW and packed a handgun because she felt threatened. Fine. No problem. For HER.

The rest of us? Well, we don't rate her exalted status.

Prohibitionists claim their morals are more moral than others' morals; hence their unequal "distribution" of the right to self-defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. does she still have one
i heard she got rid of her CCW and her handgun....though i dont remember from where i saw this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boomer 50 Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. She still has it
At one point, she tried to claim that she didn't but when she renewed her permit, that line of BS went out the window.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. do you have a link
im not saying i don't trust you- i just want to have a link to show to some anti-gunners in the future...thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boomer 50 Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. I don't off hand but
The article was in the LA times. I'll try looking for it today for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. A couple of links...
"Feinstein is a strong proponent of gun control, yet is known to have carried concealed handguns herself with a normally nearly impossible to obtain California carry permit - few people, other than politicians and celebrities, are able to obtain California CCW permits. At one time, she was the only person in San Francisco to possess a concealed carry permit." http://dkosopedia.com/wiki/Dianne_Feinstein

"Interesting Personal Note: Senator Feinstein is a staunch gun control advocate. Despite her stance, in the 1970s, she obtained a concealed firearms carry permit, and carried a handgun with her. A CCW permit was then rare in California, and was the only such permit in San Francisco. At the time, she was the target of a terrorist group that had shot out all the windows in her home. She no longer carries a gun." http://usliberals.about.com/od/liberalpersonalprofiles/p/SenFeinstein.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. She got rid of *ONE* of her multiple handguns, as I recall...
as an example to us lowly peons. Except we're supposed to give them all up, of course.

At one time, she owned a 9mm pistol, aka "evil high-capacity baby-killing assault weapon with no other purpose than to murder as many people as possible without reloading." Don't know if she still has that or not.

Considering who her husband is, I'm sure they are surrounded by people armed with pretty serious firepower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pappy Donating Member (113 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. The fact that these criminals have to hide behind so much firepower is proof
they are hated by allot of people and are completely out of touch with people in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. remember
guns for me but not for thee...the mantra of the gun control sect. of the Dem party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I smell a study in the making! Let's look up all the DNC members...
and see how many have (1) CCWs; (2) guns for protection; (3) armed body guards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. here's another one!

Let's look up all the anti-firearms control posters at DU and see how many (1) occupy positions whose previous occupants were murdered, and (2) have had all the windows of their home shot out by terrorists.


Just to save on posts: maybe someone can also do a study of pro-firearms control posters at DU and identify those who are part of the alleged gun control sect of the Dem party whose alleged mantra is allegedly "guns for me but not for thee".


Or hell. We could just do a study to count all the straw people that appear in posts in the Guns forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WWFZD Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. Hold on a minute
are you trying to tell me that law abiding, ordinary citizens hate the criminal element that preys on the weak and the vulnerable? OMG. what a revelation, this has to rank with Einstein's general theory of relativity and the continuous big-bang.
Against all guns indeed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC