Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

G-8 to confirm export ban on nations not signing additional protocol

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 08:43 PM
Original message
G-8 to confirm export ban on nations not signing additional protocol
http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/index-e.htm

G-8 to confirm export ban on nations not signing additional protocol

Yomiuri Shimbun

Leaders of the Group of Eight major nations scheduled to meet next month for a summit meeting on Sea Island, Ga., will confirm the policy of prohibiting exports of nuclear power generating facilities to countries that have not signed the International Atomic Energy Agency's Additional Protocol, giving the international organization authority to conduct surprise inspections, a government source said Monday.

<snip>The Nuclear Suppliers Group, which comprises 40 countries including Japan, operates under a common guideline that the countries to which they export nuclear power reactors and spent fuel must agree to the IAEA's normal inspections and monitoring, based on the countries' voluntary nuclear reports submitted to the agency.

The group has endorsed Bush's proposal that the countries sign the IAEA additional protocol, which allows the IAEA to conduct inspections only two hours after announcing an inspection, aimed at making the inspections more thorough. <snip>

Japan has insisted that countries should not only sign the Additional Protocol but also ratify it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Inspections of nuclear plants by international agencies is a critical
part of the effort to get nuclear power growing as fast as it needs to to save the earth. From my perspective, the proliferation risk, although small, represents the greatest risk from the expansion of nuclear energy. It is absolutely essential to denature weapons grade plutonium by running it at least once through a power reactor, to recycle the rest of the reactor grad Plutonium in the presence of Neptunium to further complicate it's isotopic mix, and to fission as much as is possible to reduce inventories to an easier to control number.

It is more important however to have internation observers stationed full time at enrichment plants and at reprocessing plants. It would be better overall to severely limit enrichment plants, replacing the need for them by embracing the Thorium fuel cycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 20,000 tons we have given away we now want accounted for - it
will be interesting to see if they get anything close to that amount accounted for and put under lock and key

ideal for "dirty" bomb since fright is the idea - not damage - and one can handle this stuff for a reasonable amount of time without killing yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC