Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Looks like SolFocus is about to make their move.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 06:06 PM
Original message
Looks like SolFocus is about to make their move.


St. Louis, Missouri The Boeing Company signed a 12-month contract in which its Spectrolab subsidiary, which supplies high-efficiency space solar cells and panels, will provide 600,000 solar concentrator cells to SolFocus, Inc., a Palo Alto, California-based renewable energy company that is developing terrestrial applications for the space technology.

SolFocus intends to incorporate the cells into concentrator photovoltaic systems for commercial, industrial and utility-scale solar power plants.

Spectrolab's 600,000 solar concentrator cells will be capable of generating more than 10 megawatts (MW) of electricity. With the average solar cell efficiency above 35% at concentration, Spectrolab's concentrator photovoltaic cells generate electricity at a rate that can be more economical than electricity generated from conventional, flat-panel photovoltaic systems.


http://renewableenergyaccess.com/rea/news/story/?id=45894

You don't buy 600,000 cells over a 12 month period for R&D purposes, and you don't buy them to stuff them in a warehouse. It looks like next year SolFocus will join MicroPV and Stellaris in actually tendering a product for sale. The rest of the companies (listed here) better get a move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. I have a *physics* question (almost)
(Ooh, ooh, Mr. Kotter!) :)

I thought that solar thermal was more efficient and had a much lower cost than solar PV (photovoltaic). Are these systems for proof-of-concept, or is PV now more efficient than thermal?

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sorry for the late reply.
I just updated my dkos diary here.

Solar thermal and CPV are neck and neck (along with thermophotovoltaics and thermoacoustics -- quantum well thermoelectrics may bring them into the race too.)

Normal unconcentrated PV is way behind thermal, but once concentrated special cells like those made at Spectrolab can be extremely efficient.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Do you know which of these companies are listed on the market?
thanks. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC