Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A nice overview of the international Gen IV nuclear systems effort.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 11:02 AM
Original message
A nice overview of the international Gen IV nuclear systems effort.
Sustainability is the ability to meet the needs of the present generation while enhancing the ability of future generations to meet society’s needs indefinitely into the future. In this roadmap, sustainability goals are defined with focus on waste management and resource utilization. Other factors that are commonly associated with sustainability, such as economics and environment,a are considered separately in the technology roadmap to stress their importance. Looking ahead to the findings of this roadmap, the benefits of meeting sustainability goals include:

• Extending the nuclear fuel supply into future centuries by recycling used fuel to recover its energy content, and by converting 238U to new fuel

• Having a positive impact on the environment through the displacement of polluting energy and transportation sources by nuclear electricity generation
and nuclear-produced hydrogen.

• Allowing geologic waste repositories to accept the waste of many more plant-years of nuclear plant operation through substantial reduction in the amount of wastes and their decay heat

• Greatly simplifying the scientific analysis and demonstration of safe repository performance for very long time periods (beyond 1000 years), by a
large reduction in the lifetime and toxicity of the residual radioactive wastes sent to repositories for final geologic disposal.

Competitive Nuclear Energy

Economics goals broadly consider competitive costs and financial risks of nuclear energy systems...


http://gif.inel.gov/roadmap/pdfs/gen_iv_roadmap.pdf

Many detailed descriptions of the reactor types selected and research needs are included.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Now there's a bushco policy
Greatly simplifying the scientific analysis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Say what?
Seems like you'd want to nuke me, if you had half a chance.

What I am saying is that anyone who wants to simplify scientific analysis is like someone who says there is no human induced global warming.

Same idiots, different story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. No...
I am trying to make clear, in this crisis, the moral and intellectual bankruptcy of simplifying scientific analysis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. You're misunderstanding what "simplify" means in this context.
They are not talking about doing some kind of slipshod analysis.

What they are talking about is making it easier to do a complete and proper analysis by reducing the amount, toxicity, and lifetime of the waste.

Less waste that is less toxic and that has a shorter half-life means that it doesn't have to be contained in the repository as long (due to the reduced half-life and lower toxicity) and that it will be easier to contain (due to the reduced heat). Because of the reduction in the necessary containment time, and the increase in the ease of containment, a proper analysis is easier to do.

We can argue about whether or not this plan will work (I need a little more convincing), but this plan is not advocating slipshod analysis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Ok, I see that now
Thanks for the non-kneejerk reply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. You're welcome.
Happy to be of service. We've all gotten so used to the right-wing attack on science that we see it in places where it isn't really occurring. It's very easy to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC