Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The coming ice age

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
brokensymmetry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 08:32 PM
Original message
The coming ice age
I thought this article might be of interest, especially in light of the discussions about peak oil.

I've included 4 paragraphs - but please read the article if you've got the time.
-------------------------------------------------------
http://www.backwoodshome.com/articles2/silveira86lw.html

But we now have evidence that ice ages come on with an abruptness that will catch us by total surprise. Physical evidence indicates that when the last ice age started, the British Isles went from a temperate climate to being completely covered with glaciers hundreds of feet thick in just 20 years.


Countries bordering on both sides of the Atlantic will change radically as a result of changes in the Gulf Stream, and Europe, which today is almost 20 degrees warmer than other parts of the world at the same latitude, will become as cold and dry as Siberia. The Sahara may again become forested while the Amazon basin becomes a desert. Florida may also become a desert, as it was in a previous ice age.

At the same time, if the climate changes enough to disturb the monsoon season that fuels agriculture from Africa to China, where over half the world’s six billion people now live, hundreds of millions will starve when the climate abruptly changes. There’s no way to prepare them for that.

What seems fairly certain is that we will go from the world as it is today to full-blown glaciation in less than 20 years, maybe in as little as four or five. And there is no way the United States can adjust to and survive a climate change this abrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. The thing about climate
is that we really don't know a lot about it. Our record keeping doesn't go back that far -- it's only reliable back a few hundred years, depending on what part of the world you're talking about. That's no where near long enough to understand very much.

It's a topic that has always fascinated me (along with epidemiology) and I read everything I can about it.

Most people are going to think the article you've referenced is totally tin-foil hat stuff. I do not know how good that particular source is, and I think he's being a little extreme -- I don't think the record shows that it took only 20 years for the British Isles to have several hundred feet of ice cover. But in that length of time, from what I've read, it did go from a moderate climate (like today's) to an Ice Age environment. Not that much difference.

What a lot of people don't clearly understand is that global warming, which is happening right now, will usher in climate instability the likes of which has not occurred in historic times. Civilization as we know it is a product of an interglacial warming that happened about 10,000 years ago and things could change quite drastically very quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brokensymmetry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I hear you...
Due to the source, many will regard it as tin-foil hat material.

However, the U.S. Government has a site that includes a summary that's similar to the article. You can view it at http://www.usgcrp.gov/usgcrp/seminars/960123SM.html if you'd like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. scientists are taking ice core samples
which can look at weather patterns much farther back in time.

it seems that the data support the idea that rapid climate change has occurred previously.

Even the Pentagon admits this is true. Did you read their report about concerns about global warming changing the course of the Atlantic conveyor, and the subsequent cooling of Europe, along with drastic weather in other parts of the world?

I wouldn't consider them leftist..maybe tin foil hat, since that's their job, to consider worst-case scenarios.

but if even the hawks are concerned...then I would think that anyone who isn't is willfully refusing to address an important issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. You're mistaken...
>>Our record keeping doesn't go back that far -- it's only reliable back a few hundred years<<

That's true only if you want a very specific bit of information, like what was the temperature on a given day 530 years ago. But through a number of different techniques -- from counting tree rings to analyzing ice cores -- scientists have been able to create detailed weather maps going back thousands of years. And the latest findings indicate that the advent of an Ice Age is incredibly rapid -- a matter of only a few decades.

This degree of change is speedy even by human rather than geological standards. And the inevitable result will be massive depopulation since our agri-business can't possibly sustain its current level of production under such extreme circumstances.

The human species has flourished in the short 10,000 year window of mild climate conditions -- but the good times are about to end. If I'm lucky, they won't end for another few decades and I'll miss all the excitement. If I'm not so lucky, I'll try to take as much intellectual enjoyment as possible in witnessing the end of the reign of homo sapiens. If nothing else, it will be extremely... interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ice?? We are burning up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brokensymmetry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sorta...but that's not the whole story.
As we warm up, parts of the ocean get an influx of melted ice and additional rain. That means that some areas become less salty, and hence lighter. And that, in turn, could affect the North Atlantic conveyor.

If you'd like to read more, an interview with the Columbia, University researcher who discovered the effect is available at: http://www.columbia.edu/cu/record/23/11/13.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Right. That North Atlantic conveyor is the
Gulf Stream. It is warmer, without question. The warmth melts the ice, look at the North Pole (open water for the first time in recorded history), and that fresh water is the problem. This scares me much more than terrorism. If the climate changes, and people are scrambling for livable land and resources, this will be a disaster of epic proportion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brokensymmetry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. BareKnuckledLiberal has a better link -
You might wish to read it here: http://www.whoi.edu/institutes/occi/currenttopics/climatechange_wef.html

It even has animations!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
minkyboodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. he always does
Hate to gush with praise here but BareKnuckledLiberal always come through in this forum IMO..
Heres to you monkeyman!!!! :toast:
Scott
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I've got FANS!
Aw, gee ... thanks, yous guys!

I've been following the climate problems since the late 1970s, when Wallace Broecker published the first scientific model of abrupt climate change. Older DUers may remember that the story broke after two particularly cold winters. By way of gossip, Dr. Broecker has a relative who is a major DUer here, and she reports that he's still quite politically active for being in his 70s, suffering a bout of recent illness, and being an overworked scientist who still gets out into the field as often as he can. He also seems to have been an influence of Al Gore's environmental thinking and Earth in the Balance. In my view, that's the kind of guy our kids should be looking up to, instead of some of the sad excuses for musicians and athletes.

(Now watch as I make the scientists hate me!)

In late May, The Day After Tomorrow will be hitting the movie screens. It's a film adapatation of Art Bell and Whitley Strieber's The Coming Global Superstorm, which is a popularized treatment of the climate flip-flop.

The website is excellent, and has several informative links. The photographic effects are among the best ever produced. But it's a disaster flick, so a) expect it to be highly dramatized, and b) don't expect much plot or character development -- though I hope I'll be wrong about that.

Now, Art and Whit have told some pretty tall tales in their day, but they've earned their pay with this one. Strieber's website has a "Quickwatch" page that summarizes some of the major indicators of a return to the ice age. I find Strieber to be among the most humanistic and insightful of New Agers in a group that unfortunately contains some pretty sociopathic characters. He's honest to a fault, so even if you wish to take him to task on his ideas, you'd find he's already been there and back.

And as Strieber says, the ice's return could be "the greatest disaster in human history," or it could be a challenge we can face and surmount.

Roland Emmerich, the producer and director of the movie, was asked, "Your message to the world -- Given a billboard for one final day, what would you put or say on it?"

Emmerich's reply?

"No more Bush"

--bkl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC