Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dynoil to Build 1.5 bgy (billion gallon/yr) Biodiesel Refinery in Houston

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 10:28 AM
Original message
Dynoil to Build 1.5 bgy (billion gallon/yr) Biodiesel Refinery in Houston
http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com/rea/home

(scroll down to latest news)

To help lessen the U.S. dependency on foreign oil, Dynoil's commitment to producing an alternative diesel fuel is under way with its plan to build a 1.5 billion gallon per year (bgy) refinery that will process vegetable oil feedstock into environmentally friendly biodiesel. The intention was announced by A. Vernon Wright, Chief Executive Officer of Dynoil LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company.

A site for the refinery has been selected near Houston, Texas, and the U.S. Gulf Coast. The plant will process conventional vegetable oil into biodiesel fuel that will contain zero sulphur and nearly zero nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions. Dynoil's biodiesel can be blended into various grades of diesel fuel that can contain anywhere from five percent (B5) to 20 percent (B20) biodiesel to meet market demand requirements.

The refinery will process approximately 100,000 barrels per day of vegetable oil into fuel that can be used as a blending stock with petroleum diesel. The company plans to use state-of-the-art technology to convert vegetable oil into consumable fuel oil. Biodiesel can also be used for home heating or electric power generation.

The company concluded from its market studies that the current market for biodiesel in the U.S. Gulf Coast is at least 100,000 barrels per day, and it identified markets on the U.S. East and West Coasts and on the Great Lakes where Dynoil will expand biodiesel production.

<a little more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DUHandle Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not so good, I’m starting to think
Dynoil is a player in petroleum business, and it looks like they are planning to purchase Unocal


This looks to me like putting the fox in charge of the hen house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. On the other hand...
Oil companies are exactly the companies with the experience and resources for building refineries. They must be at the top of a rather short list when it comes to that kind of capability.

Also, if the fox is producing carbon-neutral fuel in the hen-house, I can't work up too much outrage over that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. I note with interest that Houston is a coastal city in Hurricane Alley
Which, in fact, tangled with Rita last year. And took some refinery damage.

Paging Charles Darwin. Charles Darwin to the courtesy phone...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Trust me, you would prefer environmental spillage of vegetable oil
and biodiesel any day of the week over PETROLEUM. Much less toxic, and quite biodegradable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I was thinking more along the lines of...
not building any more of our energy infrastructure in the path of cat-5 storms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. But Dr Gray said last year was just a fluke...
...so it must be safe. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yes, I'm sure everything is under control...
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 04:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. Dr. Gray is very conservative
Scientifically, that is. I have no idea what his politics are.

But scientists are under tremendous pressure these days. It's become such a cutthroat subculture that scientists these days do a lot of CYA, like Gray is doing.

Any time I hear a scientist larding his or her talks with buzzwords like "peer review" and some of the common CSICOP jargon ("extraordinary evidence", "Occam's Razor", gratuitous gags about ESP and aliens, etc.), I just assume that s/he is involved in multiple fights for tenure, funding, and publication rights. Optimism on any count has become grounds for dismissal, ridicule, and de-facto defrocking, even for a "Graybeard".

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Well, you DO have a point there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 04:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. The good news and the bad news
The good news is that petroleum is, in fact, biodegradable.

The bad news is that it takes months for the biodegradation process to start working, and a couple of years for all the material to be reclaimed. Composting, TDP, and seeding with oil-eating bacteria can speed the process tremendously, but none of these are yet suited for bioremediation. The bacterial method is most promising, but the work put into microbial methods has been miserly.

But there's more potentially bad news -- biodiesel is not vegetable oil. It is esterified vegetable oil. I am not aware that any major studies have been done on its toxicity, though I'd recommend that people not try frying hash browns in it. But it's got to be easier on the local ecology than petroleum.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. As of Feb-06, the US was importing 7,621,000 barrels of oil per day.
http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/company_level_imports/current/import.html

This plant will produce, if it operates at 100% capacity, almost 100,000 barrels per day.

I like biodiesel. I think it's great stuff, particularly if produced from algae, but it always important to keep a sense of scale. This plant will produce 0.0012% of US oil imports.

I'm sure that many people will wax romantic about this great triumph in the field of renewable energy. According to Wikipedia, to produce enough biodiesel via soybean crops to meet US diesel (and number 2 heating oil) demand, twice the surface area of the United States (and presumably all of its water) would be required. The situation is somewhat better with rapeseed (which is used in Europe).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biodiesel

Algae, though, although it requires huge amounts of water and presumably energy for processing, is much better.

I like biodiesel for the future, though. I'm glad this plant is going up. (I have a friend who makes commercial biodiesel down that way, I'll have to ask him about the scuttlebutt on this plant.) I note that my favorite fuel, DME, has a drawback inasmuch as it has poor lubricity. The admixture of biodiesel could certainly help with this problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You need to read that wikipedia article again...
"The estimated transportation fuel and home heating oil used in the United States is about 230,000 million US gallons (0.87 km³) (Briggs, 2004)."

That's ALL transportation fuels plus heating oil - not just diesel...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I stand corrected. Whatever. Biodiesel can provide a tiny fraction
of US oil demand in any case. The biodiesel fuel can slow the rate of oil imports, maybe, but it cannot eliminate them, since it would require more than the entire surface area of the United States. (I have no doubt, however, that renewable advocates would be willing to try this - they don't generally give a shit about trashing any, ecosystem from rain forest to canyons, to farm land, to waterways, even vast stretches of the Gulf of Mexico to serve their god.)

In fact, US diesel fuel demand is expected this summer to be 3.2 million barrels per day.

http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/steo/pub/contents.html

Thus about half of US imports of oil can roughly be accounted for by diesel fuel.

The fact remains: One cannot add diesel cars and expect to fuel them with biodiesel. One cannot fuel the existing diesel engines with biodiesel alone.

I think though, that the fuel is very useful. I note that in Europe B5 is widely used. We should emulate that here to the extent that we can, although we do have something to fear in this dustbowl business that may be coming.

As always, the "world's biggest" hoopla is an evocation of something that when viewed on scale is tiny and nearly insignificant. It helps, but not much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. Great news! This company is doing something that will decease imports
of foreign oil. That's a good thing.

They are building this plant without major funding from the Government??..wow!

Obviously, they are not following the nuclear industry's business model. LOL.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Bonus question: Why Houston?
Edited on Tue May-02-06 05:40 PM by Dead_Parrot
Hurricanes aside, wouldn't you want this to be central to the growing area? This isn't central to the US corn belt. or the US itself, or even TX: This way you have to haul all your crops down to Houston for processing, then ship the finished juice back up.

Unless you're planning on shipping stuff via sea, that is. Like imported palm oil from a freshly bulldozed rainforest, for example.

Anyone else troubled by this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Edit: Any Ideas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC