Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Contempt case for Shell over gas

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 10:28 PM
Original message
Contempt case for Shell over gas
Last Updated: Saturday, 24 December 2005, 16:16 GMT

Contempt case for Shell over gas

By Richard Black
Environment Correspondent, BBC News website

The oil multinational Shell is facing contempt of court proceedings in Nigeria over gas flaring.

Last month, a court ordered the company to stop flaring gas from oil wells in the country, which
accounts for much of Africa's greenhouse gas emissions.

Shell has not halted the practice, so campaign groups have initiated proceedings for contempt of court,
which can result in imprisonment.

Shell has appealed against the initial judgement and denies it is in contempt.
<snip>

Full article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4556662.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thefool_wa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good on them
I love to see the Oil companies taking it in the rear, I hope they issue and arrest warrant for the CEO of Shell Oil then we extradite him. Pipe dream? Yes, but a guy has to have Christmas wishes, right?

I'll bet the penalties for contempt in Nigeria are pretty harsh too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oerdin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hmm.
Edited on Mon Dec-26-05 07:02 PM by Oerdin
Witout a dedicated natural gas pipeline connecting every well head I'm not sure what the alternative is to flairing the gas. Even if the cost of producing such massive amounts of dedicated pipelines could be produced economically, and if Nigeria has a delivery system to get that gas into homes and businesses (which is doubtful), then it would still take years for Shell to build the pipe networks. Essentially, the Nigerian judge has given Shell two options 1) stop all production until such a dedicated pipeline is produced or 2) Continue flairing and just pay a fine. What else can they really do?

BTW the cost of such natural gas only pipeline means that the majority of the gas produced in first world countries is also flaired. There just isn't an economical way to get the gas from every well head to the distribution systems even in Rich countries so it is doubtful Nigeria is any where close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC