Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EPA to limit mercury, other toxics from coal plants (USA Today)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 06:21 PM
Original message
EPA to limit mercury, other toxics from coal plants (USA Today)
By Wendy Koch, USA TODAY

Recommend The U.S.Environmental Protection Agency proposed rules Wednesday that would -- for the first time -- limit the emissions of mercury, arsenic and other pollutants from coal-fired power plants.

Environmental and medical groups, which long sought the rules, welcomed them as a way to reduce respiratory illnesses, heart disease and developmental problems in children. Some industry groups said they would cost jobs and hike electric rates.

The rules, which will require plants to have pollution-control equipment, came as no surprise. The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments mandated that EPA control industrial emissions, but coal-fired power plants avoided limits. A 2009 court ruling required the agency to propose such rules by March 16 and finalize them by November.

EPA said the rules will reduce mercury emissions 91% and cut those of chromium, nickel and particulate pollutants such as dust and dirt. It said they will prevent as many as 17,000 premature deaths and 11,000 heart attacks each year, and would be particularly helpful to children suffering from asthma and bronchitis.
***
more: http://content.usatoday.com/communities/greenhouse/post/2011/03/epa-regulates-mercuy-coal-plants/1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Coal is estimated to kill abut 40,000 Americans every year.
That's more than the death toll of 9/11, every single month. That's as many people as are killed in car accidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdlh8894 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Really? Proof?
Some people still heat their houses and cook their food using coal.
Do you use electric power? Do you use anything made of steel,aluminium,rubber?
Then don't bitch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Which has what, exactly, to do with the death toll from coal pollution?
Coal isn't the only way to generate electricity, to heat homes, to cook food, or to make steel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdlh8894 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. No it is not.
My point - over 4,000,000 people die from lack of heat,malnutrition,disease(from
under cooked food) etc. Coal is not the problem or the ultimate solution.
But it is something that is needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The American Lung Association lists part of the deaths from particulates
According to the American Lung Association, 24,000 people a year die prematurely because of pollution from coal-fired power plants. And every year 38,000 heart attacks, 12,000 hospital admissions and an additional 550,000 asthma attacks result from power plant pollution.
--http://www.coal-is-dirty.com/the-coal-hard-facts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fledermaus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Will they limit the amount of Plutonium in our fish?
Edited on Wed Mar-16-11 08:40 PM by Fledermaus
I think they should limit that as well.

Conservation. The Europeans live using half as much energy as we do.

New coal plants are more efficient. New pants use less coal per kwh. Wind with pumped hydro is better still.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC