Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will climate change burst the global 'food bubble'?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 04:08 PM
Original message
Will climate change burst the global 'food bubble'?
Lester Brown argues the pressures of rising population, consumption, water stress and global warming will pose the first serious challenge to civilisation through our food

The world is in the midst of a "food bubble" that could burst at any time: that's the conclusion of the eminent environmentalist Lester Brown, who I met yesterday to discuss his latest book.

He argues we are "one bad harvest away from chaos" and that "food has become the weak link in our civilisation". Here's my summary of his reasoning.

The bubble exists because food is being produced by the unsustainable use of its key resource, water. The most striking example is Saudi Arabia where, Brown says, the looming exhaustion of a major acquifer is moving the nation from self-sufficiency in grain just a few years ago to zero production in 2012. Statistics trip off Brown's tongue as easily as water drips off the crops he is describing. ...

Will climate change burst the global 'food bubble'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Alternatively, will climate change allow us to farm areas that haven't been farmed in 3K years.
The ME was the original Eden, the breadbasket of the world. Looking at it now, you'd never know it. Some areas are going to get drier, some wetter and a few will stay the same.

For all we know, China may be getting ready to really cash in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. agriculture depends mostly on glaciers (which are rapidly disappearing)
as far as most the articles i have read that is the main issue.

i could be misinformed of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I get what you're saying, but I'm talking about regular rains and monsoons...
returning to areas where they've been absent in our recorded history.

The ME and the Med. had to have had "better" weather in the past than they do now, or there would have been no chance of developing the civilizations they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. North Africa was oce the granary of Rome
But I read recently that the Sahara seems to be moving northward, across the Mediteranean. Conventional wisdom has it that rain follows the plow, but it seems that the opposite is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Saudi's still have a lot of oil
And it's about to hit record prices this year. For awhile, they can buy whatever food they need, and can accelerate desalinization efforts, if economical. I would imagine that if $200/barrel oil comes and stays, that solar technologies would become quite economically feasible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. The point of the example is the Saudi's aquifer is done, and so is their agriculture
A large part of US agriculture only exists because of the Oglalla aquifer which will at some point also be done - its also being drawn down unsustainably.

A civilization built on non-renewable resources is a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, I think we are in trouble here
Unforeseen consequences of climate change will put us in scramble mode for at least the next 50 years. I suspect the world "food" situation is in a very unstable equilibrium right now. A small push one way or the other and blame: Half the human population of the planet is starving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Lester Brown gets it.
The lead Horseman is Famine. I wish it were not so, but the bald truth is becoming clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC