Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

June 2010 Atmospheric CO2 Content - 392.04 ppm; 2009 - 389.43; 2008 - 387.88

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 12:46 PM
Original message
June 2010 Atmospheric CO2 Content - 392.04 ppm; 2009 - 389.43; 2008 - 387.88
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. .
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Its life and life only
No biggie crew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Arctic is going to be irrevocibly changed.
Nothing can be done about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. hope i die before i get old
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-10 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. The ten-year rolling average of increase is around 0.5% a year.
At that rate we would pass 450 ppm in 30 years. But the rate of increase also seems to be increasing by about 0.005% per year (i.e. the second derivative is positive). If that holds true, then unless we get fossil fuel consumption under control, we could see 750 ppm by the end of the century.

One of the big questions is whether the oceans are losing their ability to absorb carbon. If that's happening, we could see the second derivative (the rate of change of the rate of change) trend upward over the next few decades. Not good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-10 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I think there is a distinct possiblity that the sinks are filling up.
There are two relatively recent papers on the subject, both contradict one another, meaning the verdict is still arguably out on it. However, what is disconcerting is that the paper that says the sinks are happy isn't as robust as the paper that says the sinks are not.

What makes me think they're filling up is the fact that we have flatlined for the past year or so with regards to emissions, but the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere remains on the rise.

BTW nice to see you around (I know you still post on DU but haven't seen you much in E&E, check out the arctic sea ice threads, they're awesome).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC