Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pleasures of Desertification: Having Drained Owens Lake, LADWP Proposes Dried Lake Bed As A Solar...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 03:55 AM
Original message
Pleasures of Desertification: Having Drained Owens Lake, LADWP Proposes Dried Lake Bed As A Solar...
Edited on Sun Mar-21-10 04:03 AM by NNadir
PV Plant.

Here's the punch line: The solar plant is, um...um...um...proposed to mitigate the huge dust storms on the dried lake bed.

You can't make this stuff up:

Nearly a century after Los Angeles drained Owens Lake by diverting its water to the Los Angeles Aqueduct, the city now hopes to generate solar energy on the dusty salt flats it left behind.

The Department of Water and Power's board of commissioners Tuesday unanimously approved a renewable energy pilot project that would cover 616 acres of lake bed with solar arrays -- a possible precursor to a mammoth solar farm that could cover thousands of acres.

City utility officials hope that, along with generating power for L.A., the solar panels would reduce the fierce dust storms that rise from the dry lake bed. To comply with federal clean air standards, the DWP must control the dust that has plagued the Owens Valley for decades. Its efforts are part of a $500-million dust mitigation plan.


http://www.miami-us.net/news/Owens-Lake.html">Owens Lake as solar power plant

This of course, means jobs! jobs! jobs! as it should create brazillions of jobs for window washers, assuming nearby deposits of Supersoft Downey Paper Towels can be found and economically worked by despised undocumented laborers from El Salvador, and Windex Fields that can be drilled, baby, drilled to produce clean Windex.

Spain and Portugal should keep their eyes on this proposal.

No word yet on whether the anti-nuke organization "San Luis Opbispo Mothers For Peace" plans to send out members to apply for window washing jobs that they can commute to in $50,000 hybrid Chevy Tahoes.

After all, we wouldn't want undocumented workers taking our jobs! jobs! jobs!

The plant will produce, from the entire lake bed, allegedly, 50 MW, undoubtedly expressed in the usual fraudulent way, as peak power available for 15 minutes on days when the sun is not obscured by dust clouds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 04:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. The lake has been dry for nearly a century.
It is hilarious though that instead of environmentalists restoring it to its natural state (which would help fowl) they plan to build a solar plant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. I can't think of a better, faster or more reliable way to ensure the lake is re-filled...
than to build something of value on it.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. Proper link, BTW:
I couldn't read this because your source put it in an iframe with weird spam like features: http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2010/03/10/am-solar-lake/#

The hilarity? It's so that they can keep the lake drained in perpetuity (it's flooded with water ocassionally to keep the dust levels down). It's sickening. This isn't an environmental effort, this is a money effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. The better link
http://www.greenbaba.com/20091203664/Solar-Energy/owens-lake-as-solar-power-plant.html">Owens Lake as solar power plant

Yep, the original page made my browser crash.

It was originally in the LA Times, but a cursory search failed to turn it up.

The GreenBaBa page also has a photograph. GreenBaBa is actually a solar gadget seller's page. (Note: "Hippie" in French is "Baba Cool".)

The pilot solar project would generate an estimated 50 megawatts by 2012, or about 0.5% of L.A.'s energy needs. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa has vowed to halt the use of coal-burning power plants by 2020 and -- that same year -- generate at least 40% of its energy from renewable resources.

...

Paul Thayer, the state commission's executive officer, said the agency is willing to discuss "some sort of balance of habitat restoration and solar generation on the lake bed."

But he cautioned that a 616-acre solar farm would be among the largest in California, and DWP's efforts to avoid an environmental review could pose a major obstacle. "We think the project is much too ambitious now, particularly for that kind of environmental review," Thayer said, adding that a smaller project might be more acceptable.

Thayer said DWP officials estimate that Owens Lake has the potential to be developed into a large-scale solar farm: "They envision up into the gigawatt range . . . thousands of acres." (Emph. Dogm.)

Mr. Lovins will be so happy.

--d!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. The solar farm didn't cause the lake bed to be drained
You're the one who decided to put more humans on the planet. If you are looking for the cause of environmental collapse, look in the mirror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The OP didn't say that, but they certainly are trying to "save water" (that they're DIVERTING)...
...by "avoiding" "having" to "soak" the lake every now and again so that it doesn't become a dustbowl.

It's hilarious. "Solar will allow us to keep this lake dry in perpetuity without having to deal with the consequences!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. How's your Car Culture F-150 running these days?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. A classic case of guilt by association.

"Have you no sense of decency sir, at long last?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't think anybody in this thread really understands what's going on with the Owens Lake.
I, however, do. Please avoid a kneejerk reaction to the plans for a solar field--part of their plan is actually a good thing (and part of it is absolutely NOT, which I'll explain).

I'm in the beginning stages of a documentary photography project (link at the bottom of my post) on the current status of the restoration of the lower Owens River and the Owens Lake. It's a very complex situation, with a history going back over 100 years. I'll offer a little information, as well as some insight from environmentalists who actually live near the lake, and who have worked hard on restoration efforts.

LADWP was forced under court order (finally) to begin rewatering the lower Owens River, and began doing so at the end of 2006. The rewatering was begun not as an environmental restoration project--more on that in a moment--but as a means of mitigating the dust storms coming off the lake. The LADWP had already installed a network of "bubblers" all over the lake, which are little more than heavy-duty water sprinklers that keep portions of the lakebed moist.

By re-diverting a set level of water back into the lower Owens, the upper portion of the lake began to refill (as did the lower Owens River itself). The lake, incidentally, was never totally dry, as parts of it are fed by springs (including Cottonwood spring on the west central side of the lake), but it was certainly mostly dry. This indeed worked to mitigate the dust problem, but it also had the benefit of restoring a portion of the lake's old ecosystem, a marshy and riparian area that used to host millions of birds every year before the aqueduct opened up in 1913 (the lake was essentially drained by 1926).

Environmentalists in the area--represented by the Eastern Sierra Audubon Society, the Ancient Bristlecone Pine chapter of the California Native Plants Society, the Eastern Sierra Land Trust, and the Owens Valley Committee, among others--suspected that the rewatering would begin to revive the ecosystem, and weren't just proved right, but proved dramatically right. Bird counts done annually since the rewatering began show that the environment is bouncing back with astonishing speed, and thus gives the groups serious ammo in forcing LADWP to continue and expand restoration efforts. It's now more than just a dust mitigation project, and those groups I mentioned above are currently working with the LADWP to establish a Master Plan for the Owens Lake to expand restoration.

Now, about that solar field--there are portions of the lake that are considered (even by the environmental groups) to be unrestorable. They're too toxic to bring back, too utterly decimated. If you go to the lake and drive around the lakebed--and I have on many occasions--it's easy to see which areas of the lake are coming back, and which aren't (and won't). Even the local environmental groups have no problem with establishing a solar field on those parts of the lake--it WILL be a beneficial project on many levels, and won't interfere with the environmental restoration going on in other areas of the lake.

What they have a problem with--as do I--is LADWP's suggestion recently floated that they'd like to install a massive solar field on the valley floor east of the town of Independence. THAT is significantly overstepping, and would endanger a very fragile ecosystem, so that's the part of the plan the environmental groups are NOT supporting.

How'd I get involved in this? Well, I spend a huge amount of time doing landscape photography in the eastern Sierras, and became fascinated by and started to really investigate what's going on with the lake over the past year. As a former journalist, I'm kind of hard wired to jump into this kind of project, and so my documentary project was born. I've gotten the (generous) assistance of the environmental groups in the area, especially the local Audubon group, and the project will take off with intensity in about a month when breeding season kicks into high gear at the lake. My intention is to document the current state of the lake, and what the rewatering has done to revive it. How the bird populations have reacted is the best barometer, so that's what you'll see a lot of on my site in the coming months. I'll also be giving a lot of attention to the valley ecosystem, especially the extremely endangered alkali meadows, in hopes of showing people why the second part of the LADWP solar project (occupying the valley floor, and not just the decimated parts of the lakebed) is a bad idea.

There's no other re-emerging ecosystem that I can think of that compares to what's going on at Owens Lake right now, and I hope more people become interested in it. If anybody is curious about the history of the LADWP and the Owen Valley, I can recomend a few really good books on the subject.

http://www.owenslakeproject.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Thanks Shakespeare, this deserves its own post!
The pictures on the site you linked are great (I assume they are your own, fantastic work), and your overview puts things into perspective. However, the article in the OP implied that certain rewatering could be avoided by building the solar field, so I assume that they're watering the "non-restorable"* parts of Owens Lake for dust mitigation?

*I think that is in context of the political reality that says the water must be diverted, I personally feel if they no longer diverted it then the lake would bounce back, but that could be naivety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thanks--yes, that's all my work.
The details of the initial solar plan are still being worked on, but yes, it's possible that they could stop watering portions of the lakebed that lie under the solar panels, if they do indeed build them. Right now, the lake is a network of flooded grids and grids watered by the bubblers as needed to keep the dust levels down. Standing in the middle of that lakebed in the middle of a dust storm is quite an experience, by the way! It looks like, at this point, they'll do a small pilot installation of solar panels, and base an EIR on that (they know they're in for serious legal action again from all the groups I mentioned in my other post, which they do NOT want, if they don't behave themselves in the way they proceed with this). To LADWP's credit, they are making a real effort to work with the environmental groups on the solar project and on the Owens Lake Master Plan.

And that's not necessarily a bad thing--if they can stop watering grids under the panels, they can potentially add more water to more viable areas of the lake that haven't yet been rewatered. I have a detailed grid map of the lake, but don't have it scanned, otherwise I'd point to specific areas I'm talking about.

I had assumed that everybody (in the environmental groups) wanted more water into the lake, period, but that's not the case. They're being very savvy in the way they argue for expanded restoration. They understand that there's no way anybody's ever going to un-do the LA aqueduct, so they're procceding with the mindset that they'll ask for what's realistically possible to continue restoration of the lake. I was driving around the lakebed a few weeks ago with Mike Prather of Eastern Sierra Audubon (and probably the one person most responsible for all the restoration that HAS been done--he's an incredible person, and my new hero--google him, if you're curious), and he was pointing to areas of the lake that were deeper (with LADWP water) than was really necessary for restoration, which surprised me until he explained why. The lake when it did exist was always a fairly shallow lake, and the bird and plant life there doesn't require deep water to come back, and in fact would probably fare a little worse without shallower water to live/breed in.

My first serious avian photography around the lake will start in a couple of weeks, and I'll have those pics up on the site within a day or two of my return from there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Fantastic information, thanks so much for providing it.
:hi:

I look forward to the avian pics you have planned! I believe we're getting in to migratory season so it should be quite fantastic.

*bookmarks your site*

PS when you do make those pics please post them here in this forum!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. I love that place.
I made a lot of memories there when I was young and wild.

I could fill a few jugs with water and not come back 'til I'd burned every gram of fat off my body and was cutting into muscle.

I was the crazy wild eyed skinny guy living in a $25 Toyota. I know it was a $25 Toyota, because that's what I sold it for once I'd decided not to be crazy.

Thank you for the magnificent pictures and your Owens Lake advocacy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. You were a dirty hippy?
I can see that. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Today the diagnosis is Aspergers or Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Way back then I was just crazy and clueless. But I was always fastidiously clean.

I was sort of like Michael York in The Last Remake of Beau Geste. I could dig through the foulest dumpsters and not get dirty.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. +1000 very informative, thanks for posting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Great photos
I look forward to more. Thanks for the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Excellent and rational post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. Is it too much to ask you to read even an excerpt of the Wikipedia entry for Owens?
before jumping to wild-eyed conclusions?

lots of people are ready to believe what you've said! is it all correct?

"Current management
Alkali Dust Storm at Owens Lake

As part of an air quality mitigation settlement, LADWP is currently shallow flooding 27 square miles (69.9 km2) of the salt pan to help minimize alkali dust storms and further adverse health effects. There is also about 3.5 square miles (9.1 km2) of managed vegetation being used as a dust control measure. The vegetation consists of saltgrass, which is a native perennial grass highly tolerant of the salt and boron levels in the lake sediments.<2>"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owens_Lake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC