Even in the 1970s, most of the "nuclear industry" was part of larger energy and electric companies.
Other than Areva, sucn companies are GE, Siemens, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, BP ("Beyond Petroleum"). Abengoa is the parent company of Solucar, which built the enormous CSP tower in Spain that was news here for months, and Bechtel is one of its largest stockholders. Single-technology companies are usually super-specialists;
http://www.neimagazine.com/story.asp?sectioncode=147&storyCode=2052302">Japan Steel Works is the sole manufacturer of nuclear containment vessels for big commercial reactors, and is also a prime manufacturer of
katana swords and other traditional weaponry. They currently have a monopoly, but with over 200 nuclear reactors in the works, there are several companies which want to compete.
When jpak was active in posting press releases about solar and wind projects, I thought it was ironic-funny that s/he was also adamantly opposed to nuclear development, since a great many of the projects were from companies previously identified (usually in derogatory terms) as nuclear companies. But who would better develop new energy technology?
Most of the world has no interest whatsoever in what remains of the nuclear Culture War, from anti-nuke NGOs to bloggers to the Great DU Nuclear War. The companies I mentioned make their money providing energy, and will do so using any technology they can. In the unlikely event that cold fusion ever works out, they're going to get very interested in palladium. But at least they are not so eager these days to partner with agribiz.
--d!