Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Energy chief defends Yucca Mountain determination

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 12:31 PM
Original message
Energy chief defends Yucca Mountain determination
"WASHINGTON -- Energy Secretary Steven Chu on Thursday defended the decision to terminate the Yucca Mountain program, telling senators at a budget hearing the Nevada repository plan is being set aside in a search for "better solutions."

Chu encountered push-back from several Republican senators on the decision during a hearing on the Energy Department's fiscal 2011 budget.

In his first appearance before Congress since announcing he would withdraw a construction application for the Nevada site, Chu said ending the repository program is a turn, and not an end, to the government's efforts to managing radioactive spent fuel from nuclear plants.

'Don't get me wrong,' Chu added. 'Yucca was a good idea - it would have created 1,500 tech jobs, added $100M/year to the local economy, and created a safer home for waste stored in 100+ areas around the country now. But the president owed Harry Reid a big-ass political valentine for helping put him in the White House, and I'd be still writing research grant proposals!'"

http://www.lvrj.com/news/breaking_news/energy-chief-defends-yucca-mountain-determination-83561607.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Talk to Dr Moses at Laurence Livermore Labs
Says he can have Nuclear Fusion on line in 10 - 15 years burning Nuclear Waste as fuel

I wish Obama would fund that program
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Fusion research gets a $250M/year subsidy from the DOE
although that's only 1/3 of what it was in the 80s:

http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=9986&page=87
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I believe the consensus view at DOE is that fusion is *at least* 30 years away.
I don't track it closely but it seems I've seen that a number of times from DOE sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC