But they haven't published the full figures for each country.
In the atlas, they give the percentage change figures for each country between 1961 and 2006 (eg Table 23 for European countries); and they give a graph of the ecological footprint for the whole continent between 1961 and 2006 (Figure 27) and its constituents (cropland, carbon footprint etc.). But the details for each country in the years between 1961 and 2006 aren't there.
The figures may well be available for Hungary under this:
The spreadsheets used to calculate the national-level Ecological Footprint and biological capacity of more than 240 countries and territories from 1961-2006 are available for license from Global Footprint Network.
Academic Edition: This free license is available to anyone interested in learning more about Ecological Footprint calculations and data sets. The Academic Edition includes complete, fully functioning calculation spreadsheets for the world and for one representative nation (Hungary). Data may not be used for commercial or paid projects under this license.
Please click here to request a free Academic Edition.
Three features available in other Editions are NOT INCLUDED in this free Edition. These are the Footprint Intensity Tables, a basic Consumption Land-Use Matrix, and a detailed trade analysis section.
http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/httpwww.footprintnetwork.orgenindex.phpGFNpagelicenses/But not for all countries unless you buy a license, it seems.
What that atlas has done is plot ecological footprint against the UN Human Development Index for countries (pages 19 and 20, figure 9). They have a bit of explanation of why they prefer using HDI rather than GDP for a measure of development. They also give the HDI figures for each country for 1980 and 2006 (same table as the change in footprint from 1961 to 2006).
Of the high HDI countries, Sweden stands out - in 2006, a total ecological footprint of 2.84 hectares per person, and an HDI of 0.96. Again, I suspect being a timber-producing country helps the figures. Many Latin America and Carribean countries do quite well - several have an HDI over 0.8, with footprints under 4 hectares.