Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Federal District Court Places Yellowstone Grizzlies Back On ESL - ENN

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-22-09 12:09 PM
Original message
Federal District Court Places Yellowstone Grizzlies Back On ESL - ENN
federal district court ruling in Montana today returned Endangered Species Act protections to the Yellowstone grizzly bear population. In the case, brought by the Greater Yellowstone Coalition, Judge Donald Molloy ruled that inadequate regulatory mechanisms were put in place to manage the bears after federal protections were dropped in early 2007, and that U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) failed to address the loss of an essential food source for the bears, whitebark pine seeds. The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and six other groups, represented by Earthjustice, have a similar case pending in Idaho.

For years, NRDC has been vigorously engaged in efforts to protect Yellowstones grizzly bears and whitebark pine. Whitebark pine forests are being decimated throughout their range by an array of threats that have emerged in high elevation environments as a result of climate change. Researchers worry that the trees are being driven to functional extinction, radically altering some of the continents most iconic landscapes and eliminating a crucial food source for Yellowstones grizzly bears. NRDC petitioned to have the tree added to the federal Endangered Species List in December 2008.

Following is a statement from Louisa Willcox, senior wildlife advocate for NRDC: This is a chance to hit the reset button and get the right policies in place before its too late. As we lose whitebark pine, we need to redouble efforts to anticipate and reduce conflicts with people: that means making sure people keep clean camps and yards, carry bear spray, and are prepared to stay safe in grizzly country.

The Fish and Wildlife Service tried to pretend there wasnt a problem -- even as two key grizzly foods, cutthroat trout and whitebark pine, collapsed and mortalities went through the roof. A record 79 bears died last year, or 13% of the population, according to federal estimates. The judge recognized what we have been saying all-along: protecting grizzlies requires enforceable, science-based standards to protect habitat -- not wishful thinking -- and trigger mechanisms that prompt meaningful responses when conditions change. This was an important decision -- and a logical one -- in the face of strong scientific evidence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
frebrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-22-09 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good news! K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Jul 26th 2017, 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC