Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Put a stake in nuclear vampire

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 05:45 AM
Original message
Put a stake in nuclear vampire
Put a stake in nuclear vampire
Forget about new reactors to supply our electricity -- they're unreliable and expensive
By SHAWN-PATRICK STENSIL, GUEST COLUMNIST

<snip>

The nuclear industry's much-vaunted "renaissance" is playing out like a bad vampire flick.

Every time it tries to crawl out of the grave it dug with earlier cost over-runs and the Chernobyl disaster, nuclear gets staked through the heart by an accountant.

The latest staking of the industry is the McGuinty government's decision to suspend the purchase of new reactors. They were supposed to cost a mere $6 billion and have suddenly been exposed as $26 billion monsters.

<snip>

:rofl:
"Every time it tries to crawl out of the grave it dug with earlier cost over-runs and the Chernobyl disaster, nuclear gets staked through the heart by an accountant."
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think the only safe way to eliminate nuclear waste is to seal it up in rockets
and fire them off toward the sun ... eventually, it would vaporize as it neared the gravitational pull of the sun ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. "(Patrick) Stensil is Greenpeace's nuclear energy analyst"
:rofl:

--d!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. "They were supposed to cost a mere $6 billion and have suddenly been exposed as $26 billion monsters
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC