Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More Troubles With Science at FWS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-05 05:48 PM
Original message
More Troubles With Science at FWS
The government agency charged with enforcing the Endangered Species Act has been a nexus for science politicization in this administration. Recently the group Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) and the Union of Concerned Scientists sent a survey to FWS employees asking about this subject. The result? Scientists were ordered not to respond to the survey. See gov't memo here (PDF).


http://www.ucsusa.org/global_environment/rsi/Email_Directives.pdf


Courtesy of Chris Mooney:

http://www.chriscmooney.com/blog.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Follow-up: FWS employees ignored orders
Apparently many FWS employees ignored orders from high command and completed the surveys :)

http://www.ucsusa.org/global_environment/rsi/page.cfm?pageID=1601

No wonder they agency tried to muzzle them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Some telling responses...
Ecological Services has sufficient resources to adequately perform its environmental mission.

strongly agree...agree...don’t know...disagree...strongly disagree
....1.2%............4.8%.....1.9%.........40.3%.........51.4%

I trust USFWS decision makers to make decisions that will protect species and habitats.

strongly agree...agree...don’t know...disagree...strongly disagree
.....0.5%..........20.0%.....10.6%........37.7%..........29.7%

I know of cases where U.S. Department of Interior political appointees have injected themselves into Ecological Services determinations.

strongly agree...agree...don’t know...disagree...strongly disagree
.....43.2%.........30.0%......22.9%........2.7%.........0.5%

I know of cases where commercial interests have inappropriately induced the reversal or withdrawal of USFWS scientific conclusions or decisions through political intervention.

strongly agree...agree...don’t know...disagree...strongly disagree
.....25.4%.........30.9%.....36.2%........5.6%..........1.0%

----------

In other words, apart from having no money, crap management and having their decisions overridden by industrial lobbyists, they're doing a great job!

Glad I'm not a spotted owl...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC