Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gore Warns of Sub-Prime Carbon Catastrophe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 11:10 AM
Original message
Gore Warns of Sub-Prime Carbon Catastrophe
"...For the first time in all of human history, we as a species, have to make a decision," he said, asking rhetorically, "What should we do?"

"We should stop burning coal without sequestering the CO2," said Gore, blaming the coal and oil companies for the climate crisis.

"The coal and oil companies have spent, in the United States alone, a half a billion dollars in the first eight months of this year promoting a lie that there is such a thing as clean coal," he said. "Clean coal is like healthy cigarettes . It does not exist. It could theoretically exist. The only demonstration plant was cancelled. How many such plants are there? Zero. How many blueprints? Zero."

"What we should do is make a one-off investment to switch our energy infrastructure from one that depends on fuel that is dirty, dangerous, destroying the habitability of this planet and rising in price to a new global energy infrastructure that is based on fuel that is free forever: the sun and the wind and geothermal."

"There is a myth that the technology is not available. It is available," Gore said.

Gore said within 10 years the United States should have a good start on what he calls the Electronet, a unified, national "smart" power transmission grid "with long-distance, low-loss transmission capacity to take the energy from the places where the sun falls and the wind blows to the places where the people live." "And we need it globally," he said, "in Europe, in Africa, Northern Africa particularly."

Gore's solution for the climate and energy crisis may help resolve the humanitarian crisis in Darfur, Sudan as well. "Let's start with Darfur," he proposed. "Darfur has more sunlight falling on it reliably than almost any other place. There's a belt across that part of Africa into the Middle East. We ought to build solar, electric plants there and connect them with a super grid that goes across the straits of Gibraltar and up through the Balkans and across the Mediterranean and replaces coal and oil."

But instead of working to bring about solutions like that, Gore denounced the "utter insanity" of the course that the U.S. Congress is taking. "Today," he said, "the U.S. Congress is dealing with energy as well. They are, without debate and without a single hearing, preparing to lift the moratorium on the development of oil shale, which would vastly multiply the amount of CO2 from every gallon of gasoline. This is utter insanity and it demonstrates that the wealth and power and influence of the entrenched carbon lobby to twist policy and to put out illusory impressions about this that is overwhelming free debate."

An extension of the ban on oil shale production on federal lands in the West failed to pass the Senate on Friday. Unless Congress extends the moratorium, it expires at the end of September with the end of the current fiscal year. The oil shale of the Green River geological formation in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming contains 800 billion to 1.8 trillion barrels of the equivalent of oil - roughly three times the size of Saudi Arabia's oil reserves. But the adverse land and ecological impacts of oil shale production are well known from production in Alberta, Canada. Production of oil from shale will result in airborne pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions so worrisome that the U.S. Council of Mayors earlier this year passed a resolution against the purchase of petroleum products produced from shale. Because the entire Green River formation lies in the Colorado River drainage basin, water quality is an important issue, and 2005 study by the RAND corporation warns that "not enough is known about how to prevent water contamination from surface and in-situ operations."

The power demand associated with shale, whether from coal or natural gas-fired power plants, also represents an enormous demand for water. One estimate from a Los Alamos National Lab scientists warns that each barrel of oil from shale could require one to three barrels of water to produce. ..."


http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/sep2008/2008-09-27-01.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. K & R for the ongoing nightmare of "clean coal".
> "The coal and oil companies have spent, in the United States alone,
> a half a billion dollars in the first eight months of this year
> promoting a lie that there is such a thing as clean coal," he said.
> "Clean coal is like healthy cigarettes . It does not exist. It could
> theoretically exist. The only demonstration plant was cancelled.
> How many such plants are there? Zero. How many blueprints? Zero."

:grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norrin Radd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. kr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. I know I'm going to get beat up for saying this, BUT...
I'm afraid Al Gore has made himself kind of irrelevent.

He sort of reminds me of Ralpn Nader in the 60's. That's not a bad thing. It's just that if he had really wanted the kind of sweeping, broad, global changes on the level the world needs them, then he should have run for President. He didn't. And he pissed a lot of people off by never making tht Shermanesque statement when he had ample opportunities to do so.

Now we're all focused on Obama. Hopefully he will follow through on what needs to be done. I believe he will. But until Obama is elected, Gore is just sounding shrill, and there is absolutely nothing the Average Joe can really do about it. So, people tune him out now. It's sad, because I really love the guy and I see and feel the urgency of what he is saying.

When I stop to think...if only the Supreme Court had just allowed the ballots in FL to be counted,what the world would be like today...I just can't go there.

(And anybody who disagrees with me on this just needs to think of how much attention these kinds of posts would get before the primaries began, and compare that to now.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. With a Nobel Prize and the Oscar for his documentary
I don't think your assessment is correct. Obama has stated he would put Gore in charge of the effort to address GW and energy and Gore has a very aggressive plan in mind. The right wing propaganda efforts require of our politician that they perform contortions to get elected. Hopefully this cycle will see some real changes.

Just because he didn't run for office hardly means he isn't a big factor is shaping the policies we need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Of course he is a big factor.
What I am referring to is the amount of attention a post like this would have gotten on DU just 18 months ago compared to today. There is no doubt this would be at the top.

People tune him out more now. I don't agree with tuning him out. I still read every Gore post I see because I love the man. But he seems more irrelevent now than he used to be. I'm sure what I am saying is tough to accept, but I'mm afraid it's true.

His Nobel Prize and Oscar are for work he did two years ago.

I'm sure he will help Obama, but he has already said that he is not interested in any Cabinet position. He will let him know what he thinks ought to happen and I'm sure Obama will try to make great strides in this area, but Obama will not implement some of the more aggressive policies that Gore has suggested.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. I'd like to see Gore as U.N. ambassador. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
excess_3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Gore --> conflict of interest
with Gore's brand of carbon offsets

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I take it you're a Limbaugh or Hannity fan.
They are the only people who can find a conflict of interest in what Gore has done or is doing. Surely you can dig out a more substantive criticism; why don't you just accuse him of being a liar for saying he invented the internet. The same source promotes both stories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC